Re: VS 2005, ActiveSync & wi-fi
- From: "<ctacke/>" <ctacke_AT_OpenNETCF_com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 16:20:40 -0500
Yes, Microsoft should bow to you. Their enterprise customers don't know
what it is that they need and security of devices really isn't an important
feature. Personally I'd like anyone with a debugger on their laptop to be
able to attach via corecon to any device running on my wireless network and
push down what they'd like. That would be entertaining.
-Chris
"M" <a@xxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23MQTfzQ%23FHA.252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Yes, I'll suggest an alternative - start evaluating other manufacturers
> and devices. If you've been involved with PPC dev for long, you'll
> recognize that every single move made since WM2003 has been a disaster.
> It's really kind of ironic - Gates delivers speeches saying how important
> the mobile market is to the future of the business, but the actual
> mangement in the trenches makes one bone-headed move after another. Here's
> the text of an earlier posting I made on this subject:
>
> **********************************************************
>
> I work from my home office, and I have a wireless access point set up on
> the
> house LAN. When doing PPC development, I use my laptop and PDA, both
> wireless-enabled. It's extremely convenient - I can debug against the
> device
> without even having a wire between them.
>
> So the new ActiveSync just came out. In one of those imbecilic moves no
> doubt dictated by marketing, the ability to sync through a wireless
> ethernet
> connection has been removed. The explanation - 'Some of our enterprise
> customers expressed security concerns...'.
>
> As I recall, ActiveSync 3.8 had a checkbox in it's Options settings that
> had
> to be checked to enable LAN syncing. This checkbox was unchecked by
> default - the user had to specifically enable this capability. Apparently
> that wasn't enough.
>
> So in essence, what MS is saying is that some of their enterprise
> customers
> employ people too #$%$#%ing stupid to take care of their systems, and so
> the
> rest of us have to suffer.
>
> Brilliant, guys. Almost as inspired as that #$%ed -up implementation
> called
> WM2K3SE.
>
> ***********************************************************
>
>
>
> "IMB" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:43933d7b$0$18556$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I have been using VS.NET 2003 to develop apps for Pocket PC 2003 and as I
>>use wi-fi on a day-to-day basis, I deploy the apps to the Pocket PC via
>>wi-fi during the development process.
>>
>> I have now installed VS 2005 (Pro), and cannot deploy to the Pocket PC
>> because the deployment fails with the message, "The current version of
>> ActiveSync is not supported...". I'm using ActiveSync 3.8.
>>
>> The problem is that, as understand it, the latest version of ActiveSync
>> does not support wi-fi, so if I upgrade, I lose the wi-fi facility. The
>> notes on the ActiveSync 4.1 download page advise...
>>
>> "Remote PC Sync (via Wifi or LAN) has been removed due to Enterprise
>> customer feedback around security issues. If you are using this feature
>> on a Windows Mobile 2003-based device, please continue using ActiveSync
>> 3.x or earlier."
>>
>> This presents a catch-22 situation inasmuch as if I want to develop using
>> VS 2005, I have to lose ActiveSync's wi-fi capability.
>>
>> Can anyone advise of a workaround or alternative solution, or do I just
>> have to lose wi-fi?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any advice.
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VS 2005, ActiveSync & wi-fi
- From: M
- Re: VS 2005, ActiveSync & wi-fi
- References:
- VS 2005, ActiveSync & wi-fi
- From: IMB
- Re: VS 2005, ActiveSync & wi-fi
- From: M
- VS 2005, ActiveSync & wi-fi
- Prev by Date: questions about PDAs with VGA screen resolution
- Next by Date: Re: VS 2005, ActiveSync & wi-fi
- Previous by thread: Re: VS 2005, ActiveSync & wi-fi
- Next by thread: Re: VS 2005, ActiveSync & wi-fi
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|