Re: Different PocketPC versions
From: Daniel Moth (dmoth74_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/14/05
- Previous message: r_z_aret_at_pen_fact.com: "Re: Detect wake-up"
- In reply to: r_z_aret_at_pen_fact.com: "Re: Different PocketPC versions"
- Next in thread: Chris Tacke, eMVP: "Re: Different PocketPC versions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:50:00 -0000
> I'm bothered by the use of "CE devices" in this context, and but can't
A (lengthy) alternative I find myself using when I need to not confuse them
with PPCs is: custom CE-based devices
I have yet to find an individual that would confuse that description with
that meaning a PPC.
Just my £0.02
Cheers
Daniel
-- http://www.danielmoth.com/Blog/ <r_z_aret@pen_fact.com> wrote in message news:277gu094cvn7rit31bn2luchm868da2hc5@4ax.com... > Somewhat off-topic, somewhat fussy. > > I'm bothered by the use of "CE devices" in this context, and but can't > think of a better alternative. Specifically, I don't like the idea of > using "CE Devices" to mean "things that use the Windows CE operating > system but aren't Pocket PCs". I would like "CE devices" to mean "all > devices that use a version of the Windows CE operating system". I > think Microsoft has thoroughly messed up the terminology and confused > _many_ folks, including developers and users. Thus, I think we should > be especially careful. So I'm hoping someone has a good, or at lease > OK, suggestion. Besides the general name, I'd like a name for the > recent crop of mostly industrial devices that run version 4.2 of the > Windows CE operating system, but aren't Pocket PCs. Some look a lot > like HPCs, but aren't. > Some examples: > http://www.daptech.com/products/CE8800/ > http://www.daptech.com/products/CE8640/ > http://www.advantech.com.tw/products/Model_Detail.asp?model_id=1-KOIBT&PD= > http://www.symbol.com/products/mobile_computers/kb_mc9000.html > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:21:25 -0500, " Ginny Caughey [MVP]" > <ginny.caughey.online@wasteworks.com> wrote: > >>CE devices are generally specialized, so you'd need to know what device >>you're targetting. On the other hand, there are some CE devices that are >>fairly widely used, such as those from Symbol Tech which use ARM. I don't >>now what type of app you're planning, but generally the consumer market >>(PDAs, phones, Windows Mobile) is different from the CE market anyway, so >>your app might not have a market there even if it runs ok. > > ----------------------------------------- > To reply to me, remove the underscores (_) from my email address (and > please indicate which newsgroup and message). > > Robert E. Zaret, eMVP > PenFact, Inc. > 500 Harrison Ave., Suite 3R > Boston, MA 02118 > www.penfact.com
- Previous message: r_z_aret_at_pen_fact.com: "Re: Detect wake-up"
- In reply to: r_z_aret_at_pen_fact.com: "Re: Different PocketPC versions"
- Next in thread: Chris Tacke, eMVP: "Re: Different PocketPC versions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|