Re: WM2003 SE
From: David Cleland (davidcleland_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/17/04
- Next message: modeleromy: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- Previous message: ACE!!!: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- In reply to: ACE!!!: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- Next in thread: modeleromy: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- Reply: modeleromy: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- Reply: AlanS: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:52:54 +0100
> Along with the SE upgrade i'd also like to have full support back
> on the current line of iPAQ's.. I feel deserted knowing my very
> expensive iPAQ 5550 is only 6 months in my posession and already
> considered "old", and the only update we get is WPA support.
> WPA support is nice, but it doesn't weigh up to an OS upgrade &
> decent product support.
> it's ridiculous, HP is cutting into their own fingers and into
> their customer's fingers.
I totally agree, it is a way of not only forcing us to upgrade but it forces
the price down and makes me reluctant to buy again.
I bought a 4150 in Jan and it cost me £405, you can not pick them up for
£250 it is completely unreal it makes them valueless really. Unless you
replace it every sixth months you will always loose money OR be left behind
on features.
David
- Next message: modeleromy: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- Previous message: ACE!!!: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- In reply to: ACE!!!: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- Next in thread: modeleromy: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- Reply: modeleromy: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- Reply: AlanS: "Re: WM2003 SE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|