Re: Is there any way to inhibit inactivity timeout?
r_z_aret_at_pen_fact.com
Date: 03/11/04
- Next message: um: "Re: Unicode"
- Previous message: Michael J. Salamone [eMVP]: "Re: Unicode"
- In reply to: Andrew Leeder: "Is there any way to inhibit inactivity timeout?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:11:19 -0500
I think the usual method is to use the keybd_event function to send a
harmless keystroke. I've never had reason to use it, so I can't offer
more info. I'm surprised no one has answered (at least according to my
reader).
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:53:12 -0000, "Andrew Leeder"
<andrew@asl_post_room.co.uk (remove underscores)> wrote:
>I have an app that spends up to 20 minutes moving data up and down a slow
>RS232 connection. I have problems when users have their "inactivity
>timeout" set to less than this. For some reason, sending bytes up/down the
>serial line and updating the display of a progress bar don't seem to count
>as activity. Any ideas?
>
>Thanks
>Andrew
>
-----------------------------------------
To reply to me, remove the underscores (_) from my email address (and please indicate which newsgroup and message).
Robert E. Zaret, eMVP
PenFact, Inc.
500 Harrison Ave., Suite 3R
Boston, MA 02118
www.penfact.com
- Next message: um: "Re: Unicode"
- Previous message: Michael J. Salamone [eMVP]: "Re: Unicode"
- In reply to: Andrew Leeder: "Is there any way to inhibit inactivity timeout?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
