Re: Bcc Conspiracy

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

On Feb 25, 6:30 am, "VanguardLH" <V...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Fletch" <Daniel.WC.Fletc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:5a943333-8065-4e8e-b90b-571c727ead17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

There is seriously a Bcc conspiracy. I have my default mail set up
in
HTML in Outlook 2007. When I send out a new message with a bcc
recipient, I can see it in my sent folder.

Well, yeah, because you specified a Bcc recipient.

But when I reply or
forward the same message to another [recipient]

Since you don't get e-mails where the Bcc recipients were listed, just
why do you think your reply would go to them? You are replying to
whomever sent you that e-mail, not to whomever the original sender
sent that e-mail.

or the same bcc recipient,

So are you Bcc'ing that recipient, or putting them in the To/Cc
fields?

when I go to see whom I sent it to in my sent folder, the field
disappears
all together.

It only appears if Bcc was actually used when you sent that e-mail.
So you did not use Bcc when you *sent* the e-mail.

Who's behind this plot?

The boobs that didn't manage to educate you regarding logic when you
back in elementary and high school.

By the way, I'm using Gmail and IMAP if that matters.

Gmail does not provide true POP3 and IMAP4 services. They emulate
them. There are known problems existing with Gmail for over 2 years
that they have not addressed. However, the problem regarding Bcc
looks to me more on how you are sending e-mails from Outlook than on
what e-mail provider you are using.

Vangaurd, thanks so much for your detailed and thorough response, I
appreciate it.

As regards replies, I meant to say that if I reply to a message from a
known sender and also bcc the reply to another recipient, I can't see
the bcc recipient in the "sent" reply.

I don't know what I was talking about regarding sending a message to
the same bcc recipient, it must have been the late night air adversely
affecting my synapses.

So you had teachers in elementary and high school that formally taught
you about logic? I must confess that I did not; I'm rather jealous.
I will, however, say that my high school teachers and college
professors did educate me regarding satire and veiled humor . . . Oh,
and the boobs did manage to teach me a thing or two about grammar and
proofreading.

Finally, I certainly agree with your well-founded conclusion that
Gmail is not the culprit.

Again, thanks for your time and unusually warm regards. ;)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Distribution List
    ... Copy and paste from To to Bcc. ... each recipient. ... Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP ... "Guy Lapierre" wrote in message ...
    (microsoft.public.outlook.contacts)
  • Re: unintentional BCC Outlook 2003/Exchange 2000
    ... What services are loaded in the Outlook mail profiles? ... Does this happen for this recipient from all internal senders? ... >> the BCC field on these messages? ...
    (microsoft.public.outlook)
  • Re: archival/compliance/etc.
    ... of e-mail for searching on sender, recipient, date, subject, body, etc. ... Create a hash database with a list of addresses that need archiving. ... add an archive Bcc: ... it does not generate a Bcc: header so these recipients do not show ...
    (comp.mail.sendmail)
  • Re: Hello. Im boring
    ... Is this a BCC mailing or is each recipient sent a personalized ... The recipients are in SendTo no BCC and we don't use a shared mail store. ... corrupt Mail profile; I created a new one today and 'poof' the message text ... anti-virus code running, our email is cleansed by MailMarshall before it's ...
    (microsoft.public.outlook.general)
  • Re: Bcc Conspiracy
    ... recipient, I can see it in my sent folder. ... So you did not use Bcc when you *sent* the e-mail. ... There are known problems existing with Gmail for over 2 years that they have not addressed. ... the problem regarding Bcc looks to me more on how you are sending e-mails from Outlook than on what e-mail provider you are using. ...
    (microsoft.public.outlook)