Re: Out of Office Auto Reply
- From: "Vanguard" <vanguard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:53:10 -0500
"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote in message news:elESW2h4HHA.1208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Use a rule and a template instead. The other item that Vanguard did not mention is the potential for a mail loop that will bring your exchange server to its knees. I have seen it happen and it is not pretty.
--- REPLY SEPARATOR ---
(required only because Milly used quoted-printable format)
I thought that was fixed by setting the value for the Return-Path header to null. That way, when the receiving mail host got that e-mail, it knows that it is not supposed to send back an NDR (non-delivery report) or any other bounce-type e-mail. I thought that was taken care of some 15, or more, years ago when auto-responders were then continuously bouncing between each other, filling up mailboxes with thousands of mails, and sucking up bandwidth on the mail hosts.
.
- References:
- Out of Office Auto Reply
- From: Jan Groshan
- Re: Out of Office Auto Reply
- From: Vanguard
- Re: Out of Office Auto Reply
- From: Jan Groshan
- Re: Out of Office Auto Reply
- From: Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
- Out of Office Auto Reply
- Prev by Date: Re: rules does't work
- Next by Date: Re: Mailbox Store list blank
- Previous by thread: Re: Out of Office Auto Reply
- Next by thread: Re: Out of Office Auto Reply
- Index(es):