Re: advice: OL 2k or 2003? - moving/sharing .pst with new laptop
- From: "Leemutpo" <leemutpo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:12:03 +0800
if your notebook already have office2003, why bother to install ol2k?
in office2003 you should already have outlook2003, by default can run
outlook2000's pst file
"Greta Grip" <misscarmengetitNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EZ7Oe.9538$WD.3715@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> hi
>
> bought a new notebook running XP and Office 2003.. Desktop is running OL
> 2k
> internet mail only version on Win2k. My highest immediate priority is
> being
> able to open the .pst file and it's associated calendar on the notebook,
> so
> I'm tempted to install OL 2k and once everything is hunky-dory
> (fingers-crossed), maybe I'll upgrade to OL 2003, maybe not.
>
> Should I install my old OL 2k on the notebook (and download updates???) or
> purchase 2003?
>
> thanks!
>
>
.
- References:
- advice: OL 2k or 2003? - moving/sharing .pst with new laptop
- From: Greta Grip
- advice: OL 2k or 2003? - moving/sharing .pst with new laptop
- Prev by Date: Task Manager on Windows XP - damaged?? How to correct
- Next by Date: Re: Task Manager on Windows XP - damaged?? How to correct
- Previous by thread: advice: OL 2k or 2003? - moving/sharing .pst with new laptop
- Next by thread: Re: advice: OL 2k or 2003? - moving/sharing .pst with new laptop
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
