Re: Outlook rule doesn't work
From: Roady [MVP] (newsgroups_DELETE__at__DELETE_sparnaaij_NO_._SPAM_net)
Date: 02/06/05
- Next message: Roady [MVP]: "Re: McAfee Antivirus"
- Previous message: Roady [MVP]: "Re: "On Slow Connections Download Only Headers" Doesn't works"
- In reply to: Bob: "Re: Outlook rule doesn't work"
- Next in thread: Bob: "Re: Outlook rule doesn't work"
- Reply: Bob: "Re: Outlook rule doesn't work"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 20:41:26 +0100
Or take a look at the lots and lots of anti-spam tools out there. Some are
free some are just a few bucks. Keep in mind that not one solution is 100%.
I'm very happy with the Junk E-mail FIlter in Outlook 2003. It catches
practically all my spam messages (and I get lots each day from my website
address) while still having the filter set on "Low".
-- Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook] www.howto-outlook.com Tips of the month: -What do the Outlook Icons Mean? -Create an Office 2003 CD slipstreamed with Service Pack 1 ----- "Bob" <nospam.bduk@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:fbuNd.2298$oO.930@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net... > Thanks for the reply, Chuck. I was hoping for better news. From time to > time I think about changing me email address, but for the time being it > seems easier to delete the spam that gets through. I'm just trying to > refine the process so the fewest number of spam get through. > > Bob > > "Chuck Davis" <newsgroup at anthemwebs dot com> wrote in message > news:%23b5GpZHDFHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... >> Bob, >> >> Your e-mail address is in the header information. All of the filters that >> have been developed can't stop them all. I use Outlook 2003 which has an >> improved filter algorithm which is updated through Office Update, and my >> ISP has a filter which I have turned on. Still some get through. >> >> The Delete key takes very little time for those that do get through. >> >> I suggest that you create a new e-mail address that isn't easily >> generated by a computer, i.e., b12d34u56k@domainname.com Your >> correspondents will either get used to it or place it in their contacts >> (address) lists. >> >> "Bob" <nospam.bduk@mindspring.com> wrote in message >> news:_fsNd.2206$oO.532@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net... >>> Using Outlook 2002 >>> >>> I use Outlook rules to try and manage spam. I'm hoping someone can >>> suggest why a rule that's supposed to delete messages that don't have my >>> email address in the To or Cc text box aren't working on some messages >>> that don't display my email address in To or Cc text boxes in the >>> viewable message header. >>> >>> I was under the impression from the wording of the rule that even if my >>> email address was in the Bcc text box (which is unviewable), as long as >>> it wasn't in the To or Cc text box it would be deleted. It seems that >>> these spammers have figured out a way around a rule like this one. If >>> anyone has suggestions on how to create a rule that will effectively >>> delete more of the spam I receive where my address isn't in the To or Cc >>> text box, I'd be very grateful. Thanks in advance. >>> >>> Bob >>> >> >> > >
- Next message: Roady [MVP]: "Re: McAfee Antivirus"
- Previous message: Roady [MVP]: "Re: "On Slow Connections Download Only Headers" Doesn't works"
- In reply to: Bob: "Re: Outlook rule doesn't work"
- Next in thread: Bob: "Re: Outlook rule doesn't work"
- Reply: Bob: "Re: Outlook rule doesn't work"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading