Re: Outlook 2003 delayed emails
From: Pete c (peterculdrose_at_fsnet.co.uk)
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: NewsReader2k: "Email rules??"
- Previous message: Jackie D: "Limit to Contacts in Outlook 2000"
- In reply to: Vanguard: "Re: Outlook 2003 delayed emails"
- Next in thread: Pete c: "Re: Outlook 2003 delayed emails"
- Reply: Pete c: "Re: Outlook 2003 delayed emails"
- Reply: Jeff Stephenson [MSFT]: "Re: Outlook 2003 delayed emails"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:01:28 -0000
i have started outlook 2003 in safe mode, you do this by pressing ctrl and
clicking on outlook, unfortunately no difference, i see that the delaying of
emails is a known issue in outlook 2003, any more ideas of a solution?
many thanks
Peter
"Vanguard" <see_signature> wrote in message
news:ONlfLtM$EHA.1264@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> "Pete c" <peterculdrose@fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:csg5jr$37h$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
>> found the opm log but no mention of smtp just tx and rx... what do i do
>> now?
>>
>> "Pete c" <peterculdrose@fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:csg4jc$l1d$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>> finally managed to find the folder called outlook logging called first
>>> run, is this it, this waht was in the log:
>>>
>>> *** Starting First Run (01-13-2005 18:37:52) ***
>>> ...HrPreSplashFirstRun called.
>>> ...HrPreLogFirstRun called.
>>> ...HrPostLogFirstRun called.
>>> ..... FCheckFirstRunStatus failed reading machine value "17019"!
>>> ...deleting WAB4/UseOutlook because we're using MAPI.
>>> ...writing UUID to HKCU.
>>> ...setting Primary Client to Outlook.
>>> *** Ending First Run (01-13-2005 18:38:15) ***
>>>
>>>
>>> "Pete c" <peterculdrose@fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:csg3nl$4ao$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>>> ive been to C:\Documents and Settings\<logon name>\Local
>>>> Settings\temp\OPMLOG.LOG
>>>>
>>>> but there is no log file there, in outlook it says that logging is
>>>> enabled....
>>>>
>>>> "Vanguard" <see_signature> wrote in message
>>>> news:%23yiZ5NA$EHA.3820@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>>>> "Pete c" <peterculdrose@fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>> news:cse89l$kg5$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>>>>> done that and enabled log and exited and then sent a couple of
>>>>>> messages to myself, when they come back will they have the log
>>>>>> embedded in them or will i need to look elsewhere
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Outlook's troubleshooting logfile is in %temp%\opmlog.txt; see
>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=300479.
>
>
> Once you enable the troubleshooting log, you have to exit Outlook (it
> tells you this). Then make sure there isn't an old one around; if so,
> delete it. Then start Outlook. It will probably do a mail poll right
> away because of being configured to schedule them. If you did not have
> any pending outbound e-mails in your Outbox when you loaded Outlook, send
> an e-mail. Exit Outlook.
>
> Don't know what you were looking at in the above logfile output. Maybe
> OL2003 changed the format of the output it puts into its logfile. Below
> is what I see in OL2002 which, after sending a test e-mail, shows lines
> like:
>
> yyyy.mm.dd hh:mm:ss "SMTP: <direction> ...
>
> where direction is "tx" when it transmits to the mail server and "rx" when
> it receives data from the mail server. Below is a copy of what I see when
> I send an e-mail to an SMTP server with the timestamps removed and all the
> encompassing Callback function syntax removed (braced text are my
> comments):
>
> SMTP: Finding host
> SMTP: Connecting to host
> SMTP: Securing connection {I'm using SSL connects}
> SMTP: Connected to host
> SMTP: <rx> 220 <myISPdomain> - <their comment>
> SMTP: [tx] EHLO <myhostname>
> SMTP: <rx> 250-<setup status & supported commands> {repeated several
> times}
> SMTP: Authorizing to server
> SMTP: [tx] AUTH LOGIN
> {a few more SMTP: lines for handling SSL authentication}
> SMTP: <rx> 235 Authentication successful
> SMTP: Authorized to host
> SMTP: Connected to host
> SMTP: [tx] MAIL FROM: <myemailaddr>
> SMTP: <rx> 250 ok
> SMTP: [tx] RCPT TO: <destinationEmailAddr> {to whom I sent the test
> e-mail}
> SMTP: <rx> 250 ok; [simple] forward to <destinationEmailAddr>
> SMTP: [tx] DATA {my e-mail client transmists the message}
> SMTP: <rx> 354 ok
> SMTP: [tx] . {to mark the end of the message}
> SMTP: <rx> 250 ok
>
> You don't get to see a duplicate of the message data (headers and body)
> since that would make the logfile huge. The RCPT TO command specified who
> gets my e-mail, the DATA command sends the content of that message to the
> mail server, the mail server got it and returned the "354 ok" status, and
> my e-mail client said it was done (i.e., no more other messages to send).
> Once the "354 ok" status got returned from the DATA command, the mail
> server has all the information it needs to deliver the message: who it
> goes to and what it is. After that, I have no control over the message
> anymore. The comments after the status codes is optional and variable.
> What you are looking for when sending a message are the lines:
>
> SMTP: [tx] RCPT TO: <destinationEmailAddr>
> Your e-mail client tells the mail server where to deliver the message.
> SMTP: <rx> 250
> The mail server replies that it got the recipient info.
> SMTP: [tx] DATA
> You send the content of your message (headers & body).
> SMTP: <rx> 354
> The mail server say, "Got it okay".
> SMTP: [tx] .
> You tell the mail server that there is no more data for the message.
> SMTP: <rx> 250
> Mail server says okay - then it sends whenever it so chooses.
>
> You can use the timestamp on the "SMTP: <rx> 250" line (at the end of
> sending the message) to note when your ISP's mail server got your message.
> If it then takes 4 hours for it to arrive, you need to trace backward
> through the Received headers to see where the delay occurred.
>
> If the OL2003 logfile is significantly different than for OL2002 (which I
> have), you'll have to post the logfile so it can be analyzed. Enabling
> logging, exit Outlook, delete the old logfile, start Outlook, send a test
> e-mail, exit Outlook, and post the logfile.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Post your replies to the newsgroup. Share with others.
> E-mail: vanguard_help AT yahoo.com (append "#NEWS#" to Subject)
> _________________________________________________________________
>
- Next message: NewsReader2k: "Email rules??"
- Previous message: Jackie D: "Limit to Contacts in Outlook 2000"
- In reply to: Vanguard: "Re: Outlook 2003 delayed emails"
- Next in thread: Pete c: "Re: Outlook 2003 delayed emails"
- Reply: Pete c: "Re: Outlook 2003 delayed emails"
- Reply: Jeff Stephenson [MSFT]: "Re: Outlook 2003 delayed emails"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|