Re: Outlook Rules site
From: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] (lanwench_at_heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com)
Date: 05/02/04
- Next message: Dave Traynor: "Trying to access e-mail message"
- Previous message: Robert Judge: "Re: Duplicate set of folders"
- In reply to: news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com: "Re: Outlook Rules site"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 08:38:19 -0400
I prefer spambayes too - but it's also true that the spam filtering in
OL2003 is a lot better than that in previous versions.
news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com wrote:
> Seriously, what a load of rubbish, sorry, but Outlook spam filtering
> is a joke.
>
> They had the biggest test bed of email data using Hotmail, so should
> have been able to do something better than they have so far.
>
> It took them sooooo long to finally come up with a half-baked
> solution. We were meant to get updated rule sets frequently, it
> appears we now have to wait for service packs.
>
> Do what I do, turn it off if available in your version, or don't
> worry if not available (there you go, a version neutral solution!!!!)
> and get SpamBayes. It integrated with Outlook, works heaps better
> than anything Microsoft have come up with, you can train it yourself,
> and its FREE!!!!!
>
> Chalk another one up to the Open Source Community!!!!
>
>
> "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
> <MillyS@donteventhinkaboutmailingmemvps.org> wrote in message
> news:uET2dVWKEHA.3316@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> Outlook 97 rules wizard is VERY different from Outlook 2003, and all
>> versions in between improved incrementally. A one size fits all
>> rules page would not do you much good since Outlook 97 is no longer
>> supported.
>>
>> However, since you did not even give your version, who would know
>> what level of rules you would need??? If you go have a look at
>> http://www.slipstick.com and search for "junk" as a subject, you
>> might find something you need. However, not all of us get the same
>> spam as many of us are more careful to not post real addresses in
>> the news groups.
>>
>> --
>> Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
>>
>> Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
>> the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my
>> personal account will be deleted without reading.
>>
>> After searching google.groups.com and finding no answer, Missy asked:
>>
>>> Excuse me, as I didn't think I needed to give all that information
>>> for directions to a site for email rules. I am using Outlook 2003.
>>> The emails are the same that everyone else gets, none of mine are
>>> different. I thought your crystal ball was "all powerful".
>>>
>>>
>>> "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
>>> <MillyS@donteventhinkaboutmailingmemvps.org> wrote in message
>>> news:eQGJVE1JEHA.3848@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>>> You know, we have absolutely no way of helping you without know the
>>>> version of Outlook you are using, the types of mails that you are
>>>> getting, what your already created rules are, and any number of
>>>> other items that you failed to mention. Our crystal ball is
>>>> enjoying a well-deserved vacation so details will be necessary.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
>>>>
>>>> Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due
>>>> to the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my
>>>> personal account will be deleted without reading.
>>>>
>>>> After searching google.groups.com and finding no answer, Missy
>>>> asked:
>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone out there know of a site that can help me create rules
>>>>> for this spam that I keep getting? I have several rules set up
>>>>> but I would like to make them more effective.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Missy
- Next message: Dave Traynor: "Trying to access e-mail message"
- Previous message: Robert Judge: "Re: Duplicate set of folders"
- In reply to: news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com: "Re: Outlook Rules site"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
