Re: Outlook should have an option to reject Spam Email
From: Donald McDaniel (donmcdaniel2005_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/01/05
- Next message: Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]: "Re: Double reply to adresses"
- Previous message: Robert in need of a Guru: "Re: Help error message "not implemented""
- In reply to: LND: "Outlook should have an option to reject Spam Email"
- Next in thread: Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]: "Re: Outlook should have an option to reject Spam Email"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:49:00 -0800
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:15:03 -0800, LND <LND@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote:
>There should be an option in Outlook to allow the user to reject Spam/Junk
>email, not just move it to Junk email. Maybe if the spamers got all of these
>rejections it would knock their servers down.
Why would you want the servers to be knocked down? In most cases, the
servers being used are innocent captives of hackers who sell them to
spammers.
One day, one of those servers might be YOUR ISP's email server. Then
you will complain to them about not getting your email.
Some people just like to complain, I guess.
By the way, Outlook does not do server-side filtering. All it's
filtering happens AFTER the email is downloaded to your computer.
Donald L McDaniel
Please reply to the original thread
and keep the conversation in order.
=======================================================
- Next message: Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]: "Re: Double reply to adresses"
- Previous message: Robert in need of a Guru: "Re: Help error message "not implemented""
- In reply to: LND: "Outlook should have an option to reject Spam Email"
- Next in thread: Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]: "Re: Outlook should have an option to reject Spam Email"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
