Re: Preview
From: Diane Poremsky [MVP] (dianenws_at_poremsky.com)
Date: 05/02/04
- Next message: Diane Poremsky [MVP]: "Re: ActiveSync and Outlook"
- Previous message: Shaun Wilde: "ActiveSync and Outlook"
- In reply to: Hugh: "Preview"
- Next in thread: Hugh: "Re: Preview"
- Reply: Hugh: "Re: Preview"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 18:36:15 -0400
To add to Roady's comments that all formats are safe in newer versions,
plain text is always safe, regardless of the patches. Only a user's actions
can trigger a virus on plain text messages.
http://www.slipstick.com/emo/2004/up040430.htm#myths
http://www.slipstick.com/emo/2004/up040204.htm#preview
-- Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide) Author, Google and Other Search Engines (Visual QuickStart Guide) Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com OneNote Tips: 1note-tips-subscribe-request@lists.outlooktips.net "Hugh" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:B1C48872-3822-4ED2-A2D9-BD456612CD6E@microsoft.com... > From what I can see and the comments that have been made in here it would > appear that if you are running Outlook 2002 or 2003, patched up to date, > running in a plain text mode and your virus checking is up to date, you > are relatively safe as long as your users are not opening infected emails. > Running in an open or shut preview pane is irrelevant where script and > email type viruses are concerned. Is this the case?
- Next message: Diane Poremsky [MVP]: "Re: ActiveSync and Outlook"
- Previous message: Shaun Wilde: "ActiveSync and Outlook"
- In reply to: Hugh: "Preview"
- Next in thread: Hugh: "Re: Preview"
- Reply: Hugh: "Re: Preview"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading