Re: Sorry but yet another cant open pst file

From: news.microsoft.com (fountainpen_at_amexol.net)
Date: 02/11/05 

Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:23:25 -0500

> The archive attribute is unimportant.
Hang about, that would appear to be my problem, I never realised that you
dont make a read ony file read adn write simply by removing the tick in
ARCHIVE in properties. Although why this problem never surfaced when I did
my first import (by copying the file from CD and then doing a simple import)
is a mystery to me:

How do you prevent it from being seen as read only if highlighting
properties and removing the marker from ARCHIVE doesn't do this?

> All in all, my bet is on Outlook having been opened when the initial copy
was performed.

Yes, but that worked perfectly with the first .pst file I opened??

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tutorial: De-nubbing cranks with an angle grinder
    ... how much thread you have left for removing the crank? ... You dont need to leave any thread to extract it if you use a berring ...
    (rec.sport.unicycling)
  • Re: Fixing rust on a frame
    ... i dont think so ive only heard of that for removing the corrosion on ... that builds up on a battery ...
    (rec.sport.unicycling)
  • Re: Denial of webserving attack prevention!
    ... >> think about removing that user from your computer. ... >> malicious stuff they are obviously someone that you dont want around. ... i-e use the advice given by Martijn :-) ...
    (comp.unix.admin)
  • Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:01.texindex
    ... it was my local problem. ... I dont know what was it, but after removing the whole /usr/obj and /usr/src, and getting the sources again it compiled well. ... PGP: 0x24E79141 ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: Sorry but yet another cant open pst file
    ... > you dont make a read ony file read adn write simply by removing the ... > tick in ARCHIVE in properties. ... > properties and removing the marker from ARCHIVE doesn't do this? ...
    (microsoft.public.outlook.general)