Re: Which is best format for outgoing mail?
From: BillR [MVP] (BillR_at_removethisbitMVPS.org)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: BillR [MVP]: "Re: Outlook 2003 after update crashes"
- Previous message: Michel Douglas: "Automated mail using Outlook 2003"
- In reply to: SouthAfricanStan: "Which is best format for outgoing mail?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:53:16 +1100
html: supported by most email clients. Allows rich formatting.
Plain text: Supported by (I'd say) all email clients - no formatting.
rtf: least supported by internet email clients. best for Outlook to Outlook
only or in corporate environment. Some formatting options.
Word is set as the default editor by default. Spell-check as you go and many
more features.
last one - not much unless you get a lot of rtf. best in closed environment.
The default of Word + html is usually the best for internet email. The days
of requiring plain text for internet email are long gone unless your contact
specifically prefers that.
"SouthAfricanStan" <me@there> wrote in message
news:%232zjkyIHFHA.3332@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Using Outlook 2003.
> What are the advantages/disadvantages of:
> Composing messages in HTML, Rich text or Plain text?
> Using Microsoft Office Word 2003 to edit email messages?
> Using Microsoft Office Word 2003 to read Rich Text email messages?
>
>
- Next message: BillR [MVP]: "Re: Outlook 2003 after update crashes"
- Previous message: Michel Douglas: "Automated mail using Outlook 2003"
- In reply to: SouthAfricanStan: "Which is best format for outgoing mail?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
