Re: Outlook 2003 sporadically fails POP authentication

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

From: BillyBob (BillyBob_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 01/24/05


Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:37:04 -0800

Jeff, Neo and Brian,

Having switched ports, line and adapter card, I believe I've eliminated my
hardware as a contributor to this problem. It is significant that the
problem occurs with either Outlook or Outlook Express on the computer running
XP. As I stated early-on, the problem only occurs during normal working
hours. I'd be convinced it was the traffic my ISP is carrying were it not
for two factors: 1. My ISP doesn't see others sporadically failing to
authenticiate and 2. My Windows 98SE/Outlook 2000 computer doesn't experience
this problem.

Any other ideas?

Thanks,

Bill

"BillyBob" wrote:

> Jeff, Neo and Brian,
>
> Again, thanks for continuing to give me suggestions.
>
> John, my ISP's POP guru reviewed his log of yesterday's three consequtive
> errors. No other party had access to or polled my account at that time. Yes,
> John only sees the 5 asterisks where the password would otherwise be hence we
> can tell nothing regarding dropped characters. Nothing like having a
> small-town Minnesota ISP, huh?
>
> Both of my computers are connected to a Netgear router with integral hub. I
> switched the lines from the two computers at that point to eliminate the
> possiblity of a bad port. Next, presuming the problem persists, I'll switch
> the lines leading to the network adapters in the two computers. After that,
> presuming the problem persists, I'll install my spare network adapter and
> disable the one built into my motherboard. Presuming the problem persists,
> is there anything I can do beyond that to prove my computer and LAN hardware?
> The router is common to both computers, of course, but the network adapter
> built into my Intel Pentium 4 motherboard is configurable. Of course, that
> was in place long before I upgraded from Office 2000 to Office 2003 and this
> problem didn't occur prior to that upgrade. Also, this problem didn't arise
> until after I installed an upgrade to Office 2003 but I don't recall which
> upgrade. It was the "one before last" detected by the Office update routine.
> I see in System Information that Outlook 2003 has a COM add-in called
> "Microsoft VBA..." whatever that might be.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Jeff Stephenson [MSFT]" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:31:04 -0800, BillyBob wrote:
> >
> > > Paranoid as this may sound, I'm wondering if someone else is polling my
> > > account and colliding with me from time-to-time. I can't imagine why anyone
> > > but homeland security would be interested in my boring mail, but I have no
> > > other explanation.
> >
> > I know of several servers that lock the mailbox when delivering mail to it.
> > Might that be a possibility? As to someone else polling your account,
> > maybe you could try changing your password - if someone else had somehow
> > got your password, a change would keep them from logging in. I suspect
> > that government agencies have ways of monitoring our mail without actually
> > logging in via POP3 (like direct inspection of the mailbox on the server,
> > or sniffing the network traffic)...
> >
> > > I did experience such a collision once when I was logged into my POP account
> > > through my ISP's web access and polled my account with Outlook. The message
> > > I received was quite different from the failure to authenticate, however, and
> > > clearly indicated a sharing violation.
> >
> > Yes, usually the message for this is something along the lines of "-ERR
> > mailbox busy" or "-ERR mailbox locked".
> >
> > > I asked my ISP to go back to his logs to see someone from another IP address
> > > has polled my account. This will be easy for him since my address is fixed.
> > > Still, I have a feeling this is something I'll just have to live with.
> >
> > And ask if he can distinguish an authentication failure from a mailbox
> > locked situation in his logs. That would remove the doubt around *what* is
> > happening and leave us with the issue of *why*.
> >
> > Also, neo's and Brian's suggestions are worth following up.
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Stephenson
> > Outlook Development
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
> >



Relevant Pages

  • Re: A flood of spams - another virus on the way?
    ... and continual failures and screwups is simply the Way Computers ... As noted in one of the links given in this thread, with Outlook, the Preview ... find a way to switch off Preview as the default when you create a new folder. ... > Those of us not running billyboxes don't have reliability problems. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Event ID 1003 -> DHCP problem
    ... I don't think it's switch related, because it's the external nic that's ... this is an expected behavior while DHCP Client failed to ... Considering your scenario that the affected network adapter is ... I suggest that you replace the external network adapter on the SBS ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Orbiter can save itself!
    ... The photos I've seen show the switch panels *removed* in order to ... install the RCO cable, so the switches would no longer be there for ... shuttle if necessary, or will every shuttle have its own RCO kit with ... I was asking about the original design of the shuttle computers, ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • RE: system logging is not
    ... your switch over to another system and using ethereal to look at it. ... Subject: system logging is not ... Noticed during the reboot that system logging and httpd startup both ... computers on the network, ...
    (RedHat)
  • baffling speed problem
    ... There are a bunch of computers connected to the switch, ... Connections between computers in our building are fast. ... If a computer is plugged into a network jack, ...
    (comp.dcom.lans.ethernet)