Re: Spam filter does not work
From: George Hester (hesterloli_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/27/04
- Next message: Steven Osterloh: "Re: Archived Folders Error"
- Previous message: Kelly Gurney: "Re: Outlook will not send messages in "outbox""
- In reply to: Titomontes: "Re: Spam filter does not work"
- Next in thread: _Vanguard_: "Re: Spam filter does not work"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:59:12 -0500
How are you going to get back at the spammer? Please explain. If you think you are going to get that info
from the headers of the e-mail good luck. The source there may know nothing about it and likely don't care
anyway. Spam them and you may find your ISP after your ***.
There is only one way to beat the spammer and that is never use the e-mail address for any purpose that has
anything to do with a commercial enterprise. They will all everyone of them sell or give your e-mail address out. They all do it say they don't but do. And then if you hook up with AOL or users that like to send mult-recipient e-mails you'll lock right into the spammers.
Spammers don't have horns and a forked tongue. Hopefully someday they'll have a police record and there
will be a movement to ban them from the Internet like we ban convicted Peadophiles from associating with
children, but that day has yet to come.
-- George Hester _________________________________ "Titomontes" <Titomontes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4D23BF25-AB86-4001-A062-16701FE5CF4D@microsoft.com... > I've already checked the message's headers, and none of them have any > reminiscence of an address known to me; I can't understand how is it possible > that a message gets through the exclusive filter. I even reinstalled outlook, > and I can't find a way to create rules, as i had in I-hate-spam plug-in. > Outlook also should have a way to get back at the spammer, as there is a new > program that works similarly to the SETI background program, overflowing the > website of the spammer (I can't recall the name, but it's sill beta). > > A. Montes > > "_Vanguard_" wrote: > > > "Titomontes" <Titomontes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:B2963F49-C753-40A9-B556-E087707D3DE2@microsoft.com... > > >I have Outlook 2003 installed, and the spam filter is set to exclusive > > >and > > > the rules have been updated to the last file microsoft provides, but > > > still > > > spam gets to my Inbox. > > > Is there any fix for this? > > > > > > Presumably exclusive mode means you receive e-mails (i.e., they stay in > > your Inbox rather than getting deleted or moved) only from those senders > > that are listed in your address book(s) (i.e., contacts). Well, that > > only means that the spammer has to use an e-mail address that is in your > > address book to get it past the exclusive filtering. Might be about > > time to review your contacts to see if any of those are spam-friendly. > > Might be time to start looking at the headers of the spam e-mails to see > > if they indeed originate from the e-mail account they claim to > > originate. I can say that I'm you when sending e-mails but the headers > > will say different. > > > >
- Next message: Steven Osterloh: "Re: Archived Folders Error"
- Previous message: Kelly Gurney: "Re: Outlook will not send messages in "outbox""
- In reply to: Titomontes: "Re: Spam filter does not work"
- Next in thread: _Vanguard_: "Re: Spam filter does not work"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]