Re: Send on Behalf

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Roady [MVP] (newsgroups_DELETE__at__DELETE_sparnaaij_NO_._SPAM_net)
Date: 11/26/04 

Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:49:29 +0100

When you compose a new message fill in the desired From field and To field.
Then choose View-> Options... and specify the Have Replies Send To option.
When you now send the message and the receiving end presses Reply the To
field will be filled with the name you set in the Options... 

-- 
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
www.howto-outlook.com
Tips of the month:
-What do the Outlook Icons Mean?
-Create an Office 2003 CD slipstreamed with Service Pack 1
-----
"PAUL P." <PAULP@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
news:CA0355F9-A886-4D9B-8002-758B43CB6D5E@microsoft.com...
> Sorry, I got it and everything works fine except in the options to send to
> another address.  I am able to reply with the send on behalf portion to 
> get
> it working.  My problem was that I am and have been using accounts that 
> were
> part of the admin group so I never did see the from text box nor the sent 
> on
> behalf.  So I created two test accounts without admin priv's and it works
> fine.  But the only issue I have now is the Option area you describe.  I
> think the concept of picking who should continue the email conversation is
> great because lets face it, people come and go and some bosses just do not
> want to deal with things further and have their admin deal with it.  I am
> able to pull up the GAL and enter a name in the list, but the reply in the
> same or original email does not go to the newly designated party.  Is the
> something else I am missing - rights wise for this option or do I need to
> reboot, log on and off or just wait for maybe a server replication to take
> place?  I did force a dc forest wde sync but still the same results so I 
> am
> not sure what to do next but like exchange and outlook matters, try try 
> again.
>
> Thank you for your assistance for pointing me in the right direction but 
> do
> need to drive the ball home.
> Happy Holiday's
> Paul
>
> "PAUL P." wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the quick update.  I do not see the option for this, can 
>> you be
>> more specific?  Much thanks and Happy T-Day.
>>
>> "Roady [MVP]" wrote:
>>
>> > On the Options... screen of the message she can specify that replies 
>> > should
>> > be send to her.
>> >
>> > -- 
>> > Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
>> > www.howto-outlook.com
>> >
>> > Tips of the month:
>> > -What do the Outlook Icons Mean?
>> > -Create an Office 2003 CD slipstreamed with Service Pack 1
>> >
>> > -----
>> > "PAUL P." <PAULP@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> > news:00B00F85-30F0-43CA-B4B8-4975E5F42FB8@microsoft.com...
>> > > Hello, Quick Q.:
>> > > My bosses secretary has send on behalf enabled and all works fine. 
>> > > She
>> > > replied to one of his mails on behalf of him and would only like the
>> > > receiving party to send her the mail back. I know - wierd. Is there a 
>> > > way
>> > > to
>> > > have the recipient of the send on behalf reply only send mail replied 
>> > > to
>> > > back
>> > > to the Secretary automatically and not to the boss.  Say the client
>> > > replied
>> > > to the sent on hehalf emai reply.
>> > >
>> > > The admin mentioned that is worked in older Outlook versions - truth?
>> > > She currently has full rights to his mailbox and recieves a duplicate 
>> > > copy
>> > > of all mail that goes to the bosses mailbox becuase he is quick to 
>> > > delete
>> > > before he thinks about things. - Just a little history on why this 
>> > > is.
>> > >
>> > > Any thoughts woul ben appreciated.
>> > > Paul
>> >
>> >
>> >

Relevant Pages

  • [fw-wiz] Re: Proxy and Stateful together ??
    ... Paul, and all you wizards, ... In regards to the paragraph at the bottom, I did in fact get many replies, ... Here to summarize what I got, ... > Vendors are encouraged to e-mail the original questioner directly should ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: Wheel-reinvention with Python
    ... >> have tried wxPython". ... Paul, ... with both your reading of posts and with your replies. ... is you end up trying to defend your earlier statements, which, due to ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Guyots Indicate: World Wide Flood
    ... Paul J Gans wrote: ... these are the types of replies one can expect when ... crushingly stupid trolling posts. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: JSH: SF: New factoring method
    ... JSH gets fewer serious responses ... For years now most replies are from folks just ... In any case, Paul didn't call for more replies of any kind, just less of #3. ... likely to trigger a response from him. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Workgroups - Browsing
    ... Private mail is usually not replied to. ... "Paul" wrote in message ... >> workgroup, the slower network browsing will be. ... >> * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)