Re: Outlook vs. Outlook Express
From: Diane Poremsky [MVP] (dianenws_at_poremsky.com)
Date: 10/10/04
- Next message: akm: "Beware of OL2000 SP-1 thru 3 (no stop eml blkg / no 2005 web cal f"
- Previous message: Bruno: "Importing dbx files to Outlook 2003"
- In reply to: Ron B: "Outlook vs. Outlook Express"
- Next in thread: Chuck Davis: "Re: Outlook vs. Outlook Express"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 12:31:28 -0400
The only question should be "Do you need the extra features in Outlook?" As
far as security, it depends on the versions of each, with the latest
versions the most secure. Outlook is probably more secure if you have the
most recent versions of both, but if you have Outlook 2000 it is far less
secure than OE6.
For more indepth comparison, see http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/olexpr.htm
-- Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide) Author, Google and Other Search Engines (Visual QuickStart Guide) Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com Join OneNote Tips mailing list: http://www.onenote-tips.net/ "Ron B" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:31bb01c4aee3$67ef4600$a401280a@phx.gbl... > Hi All, > > What is the difference between Outlook and Outlook > Express? Which would be the more prudent to use for > security purposes and filtering spam? TIA > > Ron B.
- Next message: akm: "Beware of OL2000 SP-1 thru 3 (no stop eml blkg / no 2005 web cal f"
- Previous message: Bruno: "Importing dbx files to Outlook 2003"
- In reply to: Ron B: "Outlook vs. Outlook Express"
- Next in thread: Chuck Davis: "Re: Outlook vs. Outlook Express"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|