Re: 'To' Field
From: *Vanguard* (no-email_at_bogus-domain.nix)
Date: 02/05/04
- Next message: Rifleman: "Re: Recovering deleted address book?"
- Previous message: CF: "Invalid use of null sender"
- In reply to: Diane Poremsky [MVP]: "Re: 'To' Field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:20:34 -0600
"Diane Poremsky [MVP]" said in
news:%231IcWRD7DHA.804@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl:
> try it and see :) there is a limit, based on the length of the
> addresses.
>
>
> "Teri" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:b82501c3ec33$c860cc20$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>> Is there a cap on the number of email addresses you can
>> put in the 'to' field or 'bcc' field?
>> Is it possible to put up to 3000 addresses in?
I bet Teri hits her ISP's quota limit first as to how many aggregate
recipients in the To, CC, and BCC headers is allowed. Bet Teri finds her
ISP won't allow more than, say, 50 recipients per e-mail message. Could be
25, might be 100, but your ISP isn't going to let you pay for a business
account to spew out thousands of messages at the price for a personal
account.
-- ____________________________________________________________ *** Post replies to newsgroup. E-mail is not accepted. *** ____________________________________________________________
- Next message: Rifleman: "Re: Recovering deleted address book?"
- Previous message: CF: "Invalid use of null sender"
- In reply to: Diane Poremsky [MVP]: "Re: 'To' Field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
