Re: Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0
From: Diane Poremsky [MVP] (dianenws_at_poremsky.com)
Date: 11/01/04
- Next message: mary: "Re: Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0"
- Previous message: mary: "Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0"
- In reply to: mary: "Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0"
- Next in thread: mary: "Re: Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0"
- Reply: mary: "Re: Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:34:30 -0500
Then why not just keep a machine running an older OS running if you are
unwilling to upgrade?
FWIW, the cost of buying and learning a new program will probably cost a lot
more than upgrading - as will rolling back to an old os on one or more
computers.
-- Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide) Author, Google and Other Search Engines (Visual QuickStart Guide) Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com Join OneNote Tips mailing list: http://www.onenote-tips.net/ "mary" <anon> wrote in message news:ODraIlGwEHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Does anyone know of a reliable company that makes a voice/fax phone > answering system for a small company? Thought Communications, the maker of > FaxTalk, just informed us that Windows Service & Release Patch 2 has > rendered their software useless. They say our only option is to upgrade to > their newest version. (I hope that Shell or Exxon doesn't change the gas > formula that these people use to power their Mercedes). >
- Next message: mary: "Re: Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0"
- Previous message: mary: "Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0"
- In reply to: mary: "Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0"
- Next in thread: mary: "Re: Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0"
- Reply: mary: "Re: Replacement for FaxTalk 6.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|