Re: distribution list

From: Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] (suemvp_at_outlookcode.com)
Date: 02/16/05


Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:50:25 -0500

My experience is that you can expect a 5-10% bounce rate for any bulk
mailing. Do you really want to process 40-80 returns manually? At the size
mailing list you have, you should start considering a bulk mailing solution
or even outsource to a list manager.

If you want to continue with a public folder, forget distribution lists.
Instead, simply use the individual records to perform a mail merge with Word
to send an individual message to each subscriber. This will also increase
the odds of getting past the spam blockers at the subscriber end.

-- 
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
     Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
     Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
     http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
"Sarah" <Sarah@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
news:43360C70-1247-441A-BBE1-0A6565E4BE9B@microsoft.com...
> Here goes- We have struggled to streamline and update a respective 
> industry
> specific list used for regular emailing.  In an effort to apease the gods, 
> we
> have gotten to the following point:
> In our Public Folder area we set up an extensive Contacts list (700-1000
> records).  We then created a DL which groups those contacts under their
> respective company names (800ish).  This was done to streamline updating 
> and
> afford access to all both in and out of the office.  However, the DL 
> cannot
> be sent as one piece due to its sheer size, the emails will not send and 
> if
> they do we get too many returns.  We were told by IT that we need it set 
> up
> like this to better update.  When a change is required, the Contact info 
> is
> updated and saved.  Then, the contact is found in the distribution list,
> company record is opened and refreshed to get the contact's updated info.
> We are stuck and people are starting to group together and eye us funny ;)
> No one will take the time to select a chunk of records at a time causing
> several emailings.  They want DL 1, DL 2, DL3, etc.  How do we do that and
> update conveniently and easily. Is there a simplier answer?  In essence, 
> we
> need to have overall access in one place to view, update and utilize over 
> 800
> independent companies with over 800 contact records- minimize spam blocks 
> and
> bounce backs, living happily ever after..... 


Relevant Pages

  • Database Tables Relation Issue
    ... user has the ability to create a mailing list and join others mailing lists. ... `id` INT(11) UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY, ... specific user is registered to and when I'm fetching the users ...
    (php.general)
  • Re: Database Tables Relation Issue
    ... user has the ability to create a mailing list and join others mailing lists. ...     UNIQUE ... specific user is registered to and when I'm fetching the users ...
    (php.general)
  • Re: Fedora update info
    ... > All the updates and the reasons for them are posted to that mailing ... > I am on several of the mailing lists actually, ... I'm on dozens of mailing lists, and I use procmail for this. ... Derek D. Martin ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: [PHP] Database Tables Relation Issue
    ... user has the ability to create a mailing list and join others mailing lists. ... `id` INT(11) UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY, ... two-column primary key on both listid and userid, ...
    (php.general)
  • Re: Gems not working
    ... just a bug tracker somewhere? ... There seems that if there are more than 50 gems missing from the quick ... list, a bulk update ... When downloading and extracting both lists, it look like there are 13464 gems ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)