RE: powerpoint 2007 needs hardware graphic acceleration like 2002

I am sure that this has been discussed ad nauseum, but I do think
that the
OS should impose some limits on "creativity" for consistency. To be honest,
I am not thrilled about any of the color schemes in the current beta (I am
sure that the final product would have additional choices).
One additional one actually. MS announced recently that the final product will ship with three choices. No one knows though at this point what the third color scheme looks like.

I would have much preferred if MS spent time and effort to make the
applications smarter than they currently are and should steer clear of voice
recognition. My reaction to the current beta is that (a) Word seems to have
been marginally improved (b) Excel is not that much changed and (c)
Powerpoint is unusable because it is exceedingly slow (with hardware
acceleration on or off). The new interface has been a disappointment for me.
I was quite comfortable with the previous one and I just do no see any
benefits from this one at all. If I needed to do something that took too
many keystrokes, I built a macro. I just do not need the huge screen waste
for the current "ribbon". Especially, on widescreen laptops most of what the
users would see on the screen would be the interface!!!
Actually, you have (about) as much space for your document as you did with 2003. You get a different impression though, because the top part of the window (with the ribbon) is larger than the top part in 2003 (menu bar plus two toolbars) used to be. However, the bottom part of the window (status bar stuff) is smaller in 2007 than in 2003. What they added in space on the top, they saved on the bottom. The effective space available to your document is nearly identical, but shifted down compared to 2003.

OK...but they should consider the users and not just the beginners or the
computerphobes. Computers are productivity machines and we do not need
anything that will slow us down. Take Word for instance. It still does not
do outline documents in a clever way...it is just too stupid for them. Even
the current version fails at this. And there is no way of "teaching" the
software. I would throw all the "ribbons" in the waste basket and work on
having software that learns and adopts and fits you like a glove. And give
this message from me to the developers in MS. Very few people have massive
21 inch screens and most people would like to see their document (or as much
of it) and not have the program take over most of the screen real-estate.
See my above comment.
Adaptive software is actually very difficult to develop and often times end up annoying users a lot because the program thinks it knows what you want to do/are doing, but then it happens to be that one time when you want to do something different. Take the personalized menus in 2003 e.g.. They were an attempt in making Office adaptive, but from a usability point of view managed to only hide features to users. Most power users turned them off right away anyhow (and in 2007, they are turned off by default).

Possibly..or it would be a commercial flop and then MS would have to make
changes. And I simply do not like that mentality. The customer should be
the target here of any improvements not the pride of any development division.
Even the people who complain about this right now a lot will eventually get used to it. Change is always difficult for human beings to handle and this is just one of those cases. Office 2007 won't be a commercial flop, just because it is Office. All the OEMs, retailers, etc will switch to it and so will quite a few big corporations. It will sell quite a lot and MS really doesn't need to worry that it will be a flop. If something isn't well received by customers, MS might change it with Office 14 (#13 is being skipped). Many companies (the biggest Office customers) usually skip one Office version anyhow, so they might skip 2007 if they don't like it. It won't be because of the way the windows don't look like Windows XP. It will be for other issues such as lack of user customization, charting issues, etc.

Patrick Schmid
--------------
http://pschmid.net

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [9fans] Equis and parallels on mac (long!)
    ... or in a big window ... to make the parallels window full-screen before starting equis. ... as soon as the fat plan 9 mouse cursor hits the ... number of screens: 1 ...
    (comp.os.plan9)
  • Re: Saving an Internet Explorer STATIC Web Page
    ... > What good is saving something if it isn't saved. ... >> noticed the download dialog window that pops up when you attempt to save ... > because the page may be several screens long. ... >> actually could save a static copy when your browser window occupied half ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: Saving an Internet Explorer STATIC Web Page
    ... CutePDF is also free and works well as a printer (to a PDF ... |>> What good is saving something if it isn't saved (in ... |>> because the page may be several screens long. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: Q: how do I open xterm, run command, and continue manual input?
    ... Screen is in fact a much more useful window manager than the GUI ones. ... Then you can invoke multiple xterms in each of those ... > a graphical display of virtual desktops. ... > screens at once because you remember what was where, ...
    (comp.unix.questions)
  • Re: The Need for "Single Window Mode"
    ... window management solution everyone seems to present it as. ... rewrite the laws of physics on the fly, ... merely that spacial organization itself it. ... as screens get bigger and users have more room to spread ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
Loading