Re: Installing today's Office 2000 security update (KB892842) with
- From: Jds <Jds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:56:02 -0800
I have removed Office 2000 from the computer (Windows 2000 SP4 +SR1)
I reinstalled office 2000 SR1 then ran SP3 then went to the office update to
get what was left.
Went back to updates now it only states that the Outlook Collaboration Data
Objects (CDO) Update: Security (English Version) is missing.
The other update [Outlook 2000 Update: December 18, 2002 (English Version)]
is gone (Assume it incorporated it when updated this time).
So reinstalling resolves at least one update.
Now if we can figure out how to get CDO update to stick (when I install it,
it says it was completed successfully but then when I go back to check
updates it shows up).
My early thought was that disk clean up ran and removed the temp files for
office 2000 [temp directories in my local settings and in the windows (for
some winnt) directory].
Due to reinstalling the product I think I might be on to missing files
during the new patch, if it does not see the logic (or files from the earlier
patch) then it can include it in the file re-build.
I am assuming the patch grabs the SR1 file from the CD (Which is required
even though I downloaded the full file patch) then applies the December patch
(which was download at the same time from office update) then applies the
January patch.
But I do not know what to do now?
I hope this helps someone and if anyone figures out how to get rid of the
CDO patch I am all ears.
--
Jds
"Phillip Pi" wrote:
> It is weird at home, I had no problems with old Office 2000 in XP Pro.
> SP2 (all updates). And yes, it did ask for my CD too. Something is not
> right.
>
>
> On 1/11/2006 9:18 AM PT, SE in Edwardsville, IL wrote:
>
>
> > I'm having a similar problem regarding the 1/10/06 Outlook update corrupting
> > the 12/18/02 Outlook update when running Outlook 2000. I have the Office
> > 2000 SR-1 Premium CD's and tried the smaller updates. When this didn't work,
> > I reverted my system and tried to use the larger files (curiously, the
> > installation still requested that I insert the CD even when using the larger
> > "CD-less" files). I'd appreciate any insights or suggestions you might be
> > able to provide.
> >
> > I've included a copy of my post to the Outlook Community below:
> >
> > My system is running on the Windows 2000 Professional operating system with
> > Microsoft Office 2000 Premium applications.
> >
> > I had previously applied the December 18, 2002 Outlook 2000 update and the
> > installation was successful and showed up on my installed updates list for
> > Office applications.
> >
> > When I installed the January 10, 2006 Outlook 2000 update it installed
> > successfully; however, when I returned to the Office Update page and searched
> > for possible additional updates, the site indicated that I needed to install
> > the December 2002 update. When I rechecked my installed updates list, the
> > December 2002 update was no longer shown. When I tried to download and
> > reinstall the December 2002 update it was unsuccessful.
> >
> > When I revert my system to prior to the January 10,2006 Outlook update, the
> > December 2002 Outlook update shows up again as an installed update.
> >
> > I have tried downloading both the long and short versions of both the 2002
> > and 2006 Outlook updates and had the same results.
> >
> > Any suggestions on how to circumvent this problem and successfully apply
> > both the December 18, 2002 and January 10, 2006 Outlook updates?
> >
> >
> > "Phillip Pi" wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On 1/10/2006 4:20 PM PT, mvl_groups_user@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Using the smaller updates and install from a network share, where I got
> >>>>Office 2000 files from, worked BUT I get one or two old update(s) from
> >>>>years ago (Outlook 2000 Update from 12/18/2002 and/or Outlook 2000
> >>>>Collaboration Data Objects (CDO) Security Update from 6/30/2000)!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>I have the same problem and I remember problems with these two updates
> >>>in the past.
> >>>
> >>>I'm still scouring old newsgroups, but it has something to do with
> >>>multiple versions of dll's on the computer (some from MS office,
> >>>separate ones from MS project, etc). If I remember right, the latest
> >>>version has to replace all copies on your computer (office update only
> >>>looks in 1 location), then the dll has to be unregistered/reregistered
> >>>with regsrv.
> >>
> >>Well, since this problem is reproducable on multiple machines with some
> >>people, I think I will wait for MS to fix this. :)
> --
> Phillip Pi
> Senior Software Quality Assurance Analyst
> ISP/Symantec Online Services and Norton SystemWorks (PC)
> Symantec Corporation
> www.symantec.com
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Email: phillip_pi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (remove SYMC to reply by e-mail)
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Please do NOT e-mail me for technical support. DISCLAIMER: The views
> expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the
> views of my employer. Thank you.
>
.
- References:
- Installing today's Office 2000 security update (KB892842) without CD part failed.
- From: Phillip Pi
- Re: Installing today's Office 2000 security update (KB892842) without CD part failed.
- From: mvl_groups_user
- Re: Installing today's Office 2000 security update (KB892842) without CD part failed.
- From: Phillip Pi
- Re: Installing today's Office 2000 security update (KB892842) with
- From: SE in Edwardsville, IL
- Re: Installing today's Office 2000 security update (KB892842) with
- From: Phillip Pi
- Installing today's Office 2000 security update (KB892842) without CD part failed.
- Prev by Date: Re: Office 2000 Outlook update
- Next by Date: Re: Installing today's Office 2000 security update (KB892842) without CD part failed.
- Previous by thread: Re: Installing today's Office 2000 security update (KB892842) with
- Next by thread: Re: Installing today's Office 2000 security update (KB892842) without CD part failed.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|