Re: Full Office 97 install kills vba

Exactly
"Gunilla" <kakaomumsathotmaildotcom> wrote in message
news:ucZ5OoeiFHA.3012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Inline please...
>
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@xxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
> news:OM81KVbiFHA.3692@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Sorry I left this out for you.
>
>>She did point out to the OP that what he did by posting his email ady will
>>get him a ton of spam. I think she helped him and other reading this post
>>to not to do this. Did >you think or realize this before you posted your
>>brilliant answer.
>
> Yes, that is good she told him about his e-mail address and the risk of
> spam. Good Miss PT!
>
> But, if you are not totally blind you can see that in "almost every"
> answer
> she gives to an OP, with whom she is not so "personally" familiar with,
> she
> is to at least some degree, arrogant, abusive and complain about grammar
> to
> the point of being pedantic and refuses to provide the answer even if she
> knows it. Tell me...why not give the answer and also letting them know
> they
> did something wrong with their way to make a post, just like others do? I
> know some of the posts from so called "newbie's" are very hard to
> understand,
> but it is not hard to either move along, or telling them nicely to re-post
> again with a better explanation.
>
> Tell me also why she can make a OT post but use to complain when others
> do?
> Don't get me wrong...I do not see anything wrong with OT post and would do
> one my self but I would never attack anyone else who does it, or because
> their lack of knowledge and experience makes them to post in the wrong NG.
> Should we not treat others the way we also want to be treated?
>
> I have seen you, Peter, defending her in other groups and to one point I
> can
> agree that she can provide good answers but it's rare, and for the
> records...I wanted to give her an objective assessment so I did put Miss
> Perspicacia Tick in Google and thought I could see her being professional
> in
> her role as a volunteer to Usenet but to my disappointment she appeared to
> be just as nasty as others said she was.
>
>>Also at least she helped with the above which is more than I can say for
>>you
>
> Yes, at least she helped with that, so I didn't have to and I also pointed
> out to the OP that Office is not my thing.
>
> Gunilla.
>
> --
> Peter
>
> Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
> Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
>
> "Gunilla" <kakaomumsathotmaildotcom> wrote in message
> news:#mF6cMSiFHA.3436@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Miss Perspicacia Tick" <test@xxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
>> news:hxLBe.4128$2I4.852@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > david beattie wrote:
>
> <Snipped>
>> > This is a peer-to-peer newsgroup and we do not do personal replies. You
>> > want a reply you come back here. So, let me get this straight - your
>> > reply-to address is spam-trapped but you've just made your real address
>> > freely available to spammers three times - not the sharpest, are we...?
>> >
>>
>> I can't understand why you, Miss PT, can't provide an answer to the OPs
>> question while you anyway are getting so far to write at all? Why do you
>> not
>> just ignore his plead for a reply to his e-mail address, if that is the
>> reason to why you can't provide the answer? Do you punish him now by not
>> giving the answer?.....if you know it, of course!
>>
>> Sorry david but Office is not my thing otherwise I would gladly have
>> given
>> you the answer.
>>
>> Gunilla.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>


.