Re: Full Office 97 install kills vba

Inline please...

"Peter Foldes" <okf22@xxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:OM81KVbiFHA.3692@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sorry I left this out for you.

>She did point out to the OP that what he did by posting his email ady will
>get him a ton of spam. I think she helped him and other reading this post
>to not to do this. Did >you think or realize this before you posted your
>brilliant answer.

Yes, that is good she told him about his e-mail address and the risk of
spam. Good Miss PT!

But, if you are not totally blind you can see that in "almost every" answer
she gives to an OP, with whom she is not so "personally" familiar with, she
is to at least some degree, arrogant, abusive and complain about grammar to
the point of being pedantic and refuses to provide the answer even if she
knows it. Tell me...why not give the answer and also letting them know they
did something wrong with their way to make a post, just like others do? I
know some of the posts from so called "newbie's" are very hard to
understand,
but it is not hard to either move along, or telling them nicely to re-post
again with a better explanation.

Tell me also why she can make a OT post but use to complain when others do?
Don't get me wrong...I do not see anything wrong with OT post and would do
one my self but I would never attack anyone else who does it, or because
their lack of knowledge and experience makes them to post in the wrong NG.
Should we not treat others the way we also want to be treated?

I have seen you, Peter, defending her in other groups and to one point I can
agree that she can provide good answers but it's rare, and for the
records...I wanted to give her an objective assessment so I did put Miss
Perspicacia Tick in Google and thought I could see her being professional in
her role as a volunteer to Usenet but to my disappointment she appeared to
be just as nasty as others said she was.

>Also at least she helped with the above which is more than I can say for
>you

Yes, at least she helped with that, so I didn't have to and I also pointed
out to the OP that Office is not my thing.

Gunilla.

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"Gunilla" <kakaomumsathotmaildotcom> wrote in message
news:#mF6cMSiFHA.3436@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Miss Perspicacia Tick" <test@xxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
> news:hxLBe.4128$2I4.852@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > david beattie wrote:

<Snipped>
> > This is a peer-to-peer newsgroup and we do not do personal replies. You
> > want a reply you come back here. So, let me get this straight - your
> > reply-to address is spam-trapped but you've just made your real address
> > freely available to spammers three times - not the sharpest, are we...?
> >
>
> I can't understand why you, Miss PT, can't provide an answer to the OPs
> question while you anyway are getting so far to write at all? Why do you
> not
> just ignore his plead for a reply to his e-mail address, if that is the
> reason to why you can't provide the answer? Do you punish him now by not
> giving the answer?.....if you know it, of course!
>
> Sorry david but Office is not my thing otherwise I would gladly have given
> you the answer.
>
> Gunilla.
>
>




.