lost Office 2000 license number

From: Melanie (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 05/09/04 

Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 13:02:09 -0700

Hi. I posted this question a few days ago. Some
responded, but now I cannot find the original post. So,
I am asking again. I lost the number to install our
Office 2000 onto a new computer. We don't have the old
computer. Someone posted a web link I could go to about
this. Could you please post it again? Or can someone
else help? Thanks!

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Further Guidance on Remote office Printing
    ... From how I read the original post, you have not installed the proper drive on the terminal server correct? ... You have tried to install another driver to replace it. ... The .inf file that you brought up will tell windows to use that driver instead of what the client has. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: System Restore not functioning
    ... > original post so as not to repeat the problems on this ... right click on it and select 'Install'. ... >>> the error msg and sending in my error report, ... Probably since my Sys Restore ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)
  • Re: Windows update KB896727
    ... In the original post he is having the same problem with the KB896727 update ... My auto update still tries to install the KB896727. ... >> keeps trying to download and install the KB896727 file. ... >>> In this case there should have been no confusion. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)
  • Re: Assistence with OpenSSH build/config on Red Hat 7.2
    ... > From the debugging in your original post: ... > guess that the original debugging was done without UsePAM=yes. ... ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes ... install, the installed sshd_config file was set as follows: ...
    (comp.security.ssh)
  • Re: Linux community software-update-anarchy polemic
    ... I explained this clearly in my original post. ... > Installing to a real partition should be no problem at all ... I was attempting to install Knoppix on a HD that was completely ... as parted itself admitted and as was reported in the parted-bug ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
Loading