Re: ConversationTopic question
- From: "Dmitry Streblechenko" <dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:34:15 -0700
You don't need to know the time difference, only which message is the
parent (subtract 5 bytes and find a message with that exact conversation
index).
And this won't be a flat list, but rather a tree.
Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
http://www.dimastr.com/
OutlookSpy - Outlook, CDO
and MAPI Developer Tool
"Calz" <kala.parameswaran@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1178877387.750670.56100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 15, 11:34 am, "Dmitry Streblechenko" <dmi...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
No, the prefix up to the point where it will split will stay the same,Hi ,
but
each message will have a unique conversation index, which is ultimately
related to its parent index.
Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)http://www.dimastr.com/
OutlookSpy - Outlook, CDO
and MAPI Developer Tool
"Vlad Naulo" <a...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:376eebe5311d4d8f84734e4e7983f1de@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dmitry, I have a similar question.
So if the email thread gets separated into 2 or more threads, the
CONVERSATION INDEX for both threads will stay the same?
Thank you.
I am trying to group all the mails that belong to the same thread.. I
am able to do that using PR_CONVERSATION_INDEX. But i also need to
sort it according to the relative position in the message thread for
which i need to interpret the the time difference stored in the child
indexes.. Any pointer on how to do it? since the time difference
stored in the child messages are concatenated ones, any idea as to how
to interpret it..
Thanks.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ConversationTopic question
- From: Calz
- Re: ConversationTopic question
- References:
- Re: ConversationTopic question
- From: Calz
- Re: ConversationTopic question
- Prev by Date: Re: ConversationTopic question
- Next by Date: Re: custom bound field
- Previous by thread: Re: ConversationTopic question
- Next by thread: Re: ConversationTopic question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|