Re: shimming, signing and multiple assemblies
- From: "Alex" <inssup35@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:03:43 -0400
Hello Peter,
""Peter Huang" [MSFT]" <v-phuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:9GS5QwIqFHA.2152@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi
>
> I think there is no specially thing need to be done.
> The Shim is just replace the job of mscoree.
> Without Shim,
> Word--->mscoree--->Managed Assembly----->Call other assembly
>
> With Shim
> Word--->Shim---->Managed Assembly------>Call other assembly
>
> If you still have any concern, please feel free to post here.
Do I need to strong name all the DLLs then?
Best wishes,
Alex.
--
Address email to user "response" at domain "alexoren" with suffix "com"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: shimming, signing and multiple assemblies
- From: "Peter Huang" [MSFT]
- Re: shimming, signing and multiple assemblies
- References:
- shimming, signing and multiple assemblies
- From: Alex
- RE: shimming, signing and multiple assemblies
- From: "Peter Huang" [MSFT]
- shimming, signing and multiple assemblies
- Prev by Date: All public classes are registered for COM interop?
- Next by Date: Shimming questions
- Previous by thread: RE: shimming, signing and multiple assemblies
- Next by thread: Re: shimming, signing and multiple assemblies
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|