Re: Win 8 - Win 9 codec which would have less buffering?


"zimbot" <zimbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:947C0EC2-69E0-4ABC-BD23-9C0AC071C44D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Friends,

I think I know this one ... but would like a wise opinion.

Is win 9 superior to win 8 in regards to the streaming experience regarding
buffering.
That is to say, I am aware of a superior image & audio quality ... What I
wish a judgment on is this If I have : file 1 win 8 300 kbps , & file 2 win 9
300 kbps
( the bandwidth - datarate is = ) will the 9 file tend to buffer less or be
easier or harder for a client machine?
or ( as i suspect ) the processing load is the same and the bandwidth is the
same and therefore any tendency to ..." buffering " would be the same .

( also assume win 2003 enterprise server )

Should be no difference in regards to buffering/rebuffering if they're the same
bitrate. WME9 codec does require more CPU resources for both compressing and
uncompressing, but that's not really related to buffering.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Europe - one sick welfare puppy
    ... regards to New Orleans, which resembled a third-world country, is so much ... more superior to all other models. ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: vid update
    ... > Five Sharp wrote: ... >> Regards, ... > "buffering" at 10%... ... > Not your fault, obviously - but that of the website involved. ...
    (uk.music.guitar)
  • Re: BASH Redirect (STDOUT & STDERR) Syncing
    ... >> terminal and block buffering otherwise, e.g. in pipes or when output ... >> standard library, i.e. glibc. ... >> Regards, Bruno. ... Sure, but if you didn't link make against glibc on IRIX either, ...
    (Debian-User)
  • =?iso-8859-1?q?Re:_Best_political_cartoon_of_the_century_=AD_so_far?=
    ... >>> somewhere in the world might be superior. ... >> Regards, ... Martin ...
    (soc.culture.baltics)
  • Re: Graphics Problem
    ... > sleepinside the while loop. ... Hi Oliver, ... now looking into double buffering. ... Regards, ...
    (comp.lang.java.gui)