Re: HD video encoding using WME
- From: "Chris P." <msdn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:29:38 -0400
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:06:24 -0700, tfs wrote:
Actually, whatever you'd thought of as mentioned in your reply, we had
thought of that too, and set up the appropriate h/w and encoder profile.
We used a quad-core CPU with 2GB memory, a 26" monitor in resolution
1920x1080 (probably higher). For WM profile: use WMV9 codec, 1920x1080,
30Mbps, 100% quality level.
Run in WME directly. The preview picture shown in 100% size without any
slow-down. But the picture doesn't show any HD-quality, nor the encoded video.
I then read the documentation for the WM profile; the top resolution
mentioned seemd to be just 768x576. But then the documentation was dated back
to year 2002 (and haven't changed since then ???) so I presumed WME wasn't
prepared for HD-encoding at that time.
You can't do realtime (live) HD without setting the quality to 0 or close
to it, even on a quad-core. If you want Blu-ray quality then you must
capture uncompressed or lightly compressed (low-cpu) and then 2-pass encode
after the fact.
--
http://www.chrisnet.net/code.htm
[MS MVP for DirectShow / MediaFoundation]
.
- References:
- HD video encoding using WME
- From: tfs
- Re: HD video encoding using WME
- From: Neil Smith [MVP Digital Media]
- Re: HD video encoding using WME
- From: tfs
- HD video encoding using WME
- Prev by Date: OnStatus() E_HANDLE error
- Next by Date: Validating Streams
- Previous by thread: Re: HD video encoding using WME
- Next by thread: Re: Using GetNextSample/WriteStreamSample to cut from a wmv file
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|