Re: WMP 10 streaming fails on all websites.

I'll pay 10 euro for fixing Herring's and my problem !
;-)

"Chris" <cal2002a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O2WOLdOSFHA.2356@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Even if we were MVPs it doesn't change a single thing. This is peer
> support, you get what you give. The posters don't give what they should,
> all other posters feel the wrath. Until we get paid to do this nothing is
> going to change. ;-)
>
> --
> Chris Lanier
> http://www.msmvps.com/chrisl/
>
> Replies are to help benefit others in helping you
> and reproducing issues, not necessarily for me to
> get back to you.
> ---
> "moorpipe" <moorpipe@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23M9NSaOSFHA.2680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I take most of the things back - I really thought you and Mike were MVP's
>> (I was mislead by the url msmvps). Apologies. I'm afraid many of us
>> having the problem as described by Red Herring have to wait for someone
>> coming across who really can help us.
>> Also sorry to you mr Herring having abused your post. Chris' answer puts
>> a whole new perspective to newsgroups I didn't know about.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>>
>> "Chris" <cal2002a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:u6Yg2OOSFHA.3988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> You, Chris, and Mike Williams, I believe are mvps.
>>>
>>> I'm not an MVP, I don't believe Mike is either.
>>>
>>>>> This "advice" isn't really helpful.
>>>
>>> Nor are 99% of the posts here on providing the context. It's either a
>>> reply like that or nothing, which would you rather see? All the posts
>>> not getting replies because people refuse to read or posts getting
>>> relies stating that they need to read and provide the information asked
>>> of them by the Web Help page, the FAQ, etc.
>>>
>>>>> Answer 2 doesn't make sense at all. If we all comply to that "advice"
>>>>> there wouldn't be questions at all to be answered.
>>>
>>> Exactly. All of these questions have been replied to already. You can
>>> solve your own problems with 30 seconds of searching.
>>>
>>>>> Okay, maybe some posters are a bit lazy and post a problem without
>>>>> searching the archives, but that doesn't mean to reply in a
>>>>> patronizing way
>>>
>>> "Some"? I think you mean "almost all".
>>>
>>>>> Many of us posters are simple users of Microsoft software and don't
>>>>> expect problems while using their system in a normal way
>>>
>>> This is peer support. You can consider Mike and I as "simple users".
>>> That's all we are. All Microsoft Newsgroups are peer supported, that
>>> means the users of the software support it. We might know a little more
>>> about the product, doesn't change a single thing about it.
>>>
>>>>> At least you could try to be concerned with the problems even if you
>>>>> don't know the answers.
>>>
>>> Can't be concerned if you don't have a problem listed, Mike's sig states
>>> this rather basically. Furthermore, this is peer support. If you don't
>>> like what's offered, *you* need to help improve it. It's no ones job to
>>> post here and you seem to want to blame others and not offer any help.
>>> Why? Don't you think that's kind of hypocritical? Mike and I get no
>>> recognition for taking time out of our days to post here, and we are
>>> supposed to take from you that *we* need to act concerned? You need to
>>> think about this a bit before making this kind of statements.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chris Lanier
>>> http://www.msmvps.com/chrisl/
>>>
>>> Replies are to help benefit others in helping you
>>> and reproducing issues, not necessarily for me to
>>> get back to you.
>>> ---
>>> "moorpipe" <moorpipe@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:O56PVGOSFHA.1392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, but you're reply just confirmed my statement. This post doesn't
>>>> get answered like many other people's posts describing the same
>>>> problem. Actually, my complaint about mvps wasn't restricted to this
>>>> particular post (Red Herring is also referring to other posts, but I
>>>> guess you didn't read it). It was after I did a search on similar
>>>> posts; they all ended up with no specific answers. I put my reply under
>>>> his post, because his fairly accurate description matches closest to my
>>>> problem.
>>>> You, Chris, and Mike Williams, I believe are mvps. The one answer that
>>>> seems appearing regularly is:
>>>> 1.Check the newsgroups archives for prior discussion or solution of
>>>> your problems, etc.
>>>> 2. For Windowsmedia newsgroup posting guidelines see (....)
>>>> Please supply ANSWERS to the questions there, don't just repeat the
>>>> questions.
>>>> 3. Please deliver feedback to the newsgroup, so that others can be
>>>> helped. No one gets paid to help here, and the response rate from the
>>>> helped is less than 1%. If that was how medical advancements were made
>>>> you'd all have died years ago.
>>>>
>>>> This "advice" isn't really helpful. Okay, maybe some posters are a bit
>>>> lazy and post a problem without searching the archives, but that
>>>> doesn't mean to reply in a patronizing way (especially answer no. 3 is
>>>> not done). Answer 2 doesn't make sense at all. If we all comply to that
>>>> "advice" there wouldn't be questions at all to be answered.
>>>>
>>>> Many of us posters are simple users of Microsoft software and don't
>>>> expect problems while using their system in a normal way - they surely
>>>> don't expect problems after they install Windows Updates. At least you
>>>> could try to be concerned with the problems even if you don't know the
>>>> answers.
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Chris" <cal2002a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:eYQKY7MSFHA.648@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>I don't know any MVP's that post here at all. You might want to check
>>>>>your sources.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Chris Lanier
>>>>> http://www.msmvps.com/chrisl/
>>>>>
>>>>> Replies are to help benefit others in helping you
>>>>> and reproducing issues, not necessarily for me to
>>>>> get back to you.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> "moorpipe" <moorpipe@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:edT8jrMSFHA.1392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I totally agree with you. I have the same experience and I am very
>>>>>> disappointed in the mvps not taking this seriously and that they keep
>>>>>> on pointing to general answers and web pages for solutions. They just
>>>>>> don't take the time to look into this serious problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Moorpipe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Red Herring" <Red Herring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>>>>> message news:43374B6B-446C-4BEA-A5AD-391D95DBA9FC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>I don't know if this is coincidence, but I can no longer stream ANY
>>>>>>>video in
>>>>>>> IE shortly after installing the latest round of Windows Updates. I
>>>>>>> cleared
>>>>>>> my browser cache and tried multiple websites. For instance, the
>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>> windows media streaming content fails to start:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://news.zdnet.com/2036-2_22-5604857.html
>>>>>>> http://4kids.tv/shows/videoplayer.php?show=foodons&speed=112&episode=101&;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've seen either error code 0xC00D1199 for embedded content on
>>>>>>> websites or
>>>>>>> 0xC00D11BB for content that opens Windows Media Player directly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see a number of other people are having the same problems as of
>>>>>>> the past
>>>>>>> couple days since the latest round of Windows Updates, so I'm fairly
>>>>>>> certain
>>>>>>> I'm not alone and that there is a strong correlation between the
>>>>>>> two. I've
>>>>>>> only installed one piece of software in that timeframe, but I am
>>>>>>> confident it
>>>>>>> has nothing to do with this problem because there was no problem
>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>> installing and before the reboot (I had the Updates queued up for
>>>>>>> the reboot
>>>>>>> part before installing the new software). The following updates
>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>> installed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Security Update for Windows XP (KB893066) - Successful
>>>>>>> Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool - April 2005 (KB890830) -
>>>>>>> Successful
>>>>>>> Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer for Windows XP
>>>>>>> Service Pack
>>>>>>> 2 (KB890923) - Successful
>>>>>>> Security Update for Windows XP (KB893086) - Successful
>>>>>>> Security Update for Windows XP (KB890859) - Successful
>>>>>>> Microsoft Windows Installer 3.1 - Successful
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: WMP 10 Danger do not install !!!!!!!! For You Chris
    ... Hey Chris - peer means equals. ... not dumb users. ... >> NOTHING to do with PEER support groups! ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsmedia.player)
  • Re: Network: 2000 Prof + 98 + Belkin wi G router
    ... PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups ... >I need help setting up a home network. ... > I have NO idea how to make the two computers talk to each ... > (peer to peer?). ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: Media Player 10 Picture Search
    ... A Peer in Peer to Peer Support ... >> will be included in the All Pictures category. ... >> Greg Maxey/Word MVP ... >> A Peer in Peer to Peer Support ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsmedia.player)
  • Re: Tech Eval
    ... A Peer in Peer to Peer Support ... >> Greg Maxey/Word MVP ... >> A Peer in Peer to Peer Support ... >>> Dim i As Long, aval As Range, mytable As Table ...
    (microsoft.public.word.vba.general)
  • Re: There must be a better way
    ... A Peer in Peer to Peer Support ... > For Each oWord In ActiveDocument.Words ... >> Greg Maxey/Word MVP ... >> A Peer in Peer to Peer Support ...
    (microsoft.public.word.vba.general)
Loading