Re: Hardware for windows media encoder
From: Eugene (compcontrol_at_adelphia.net)
Date: 06/25/04
- Previous message: Scott: "Re: Streaming"
- In reply to: Mike M.: "Re: Hardware for windows media encoder"
- Next in thread: Zarax [Digital Media MVP]: "Re: Hardware for windows media encoder"
- Reply: Zarax [Digital Media MVP]: "Re: Hardware for windows media encoder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:23:26 -0400
Well, I've tried to disable the hyper tread technology in the BIOS. The
result was terrible. On the first second of encoding, CPU usage jumped to
the 100% and RAM usage jumped to the 680Mb. So I've decided to enable HP in
the BIOS so then CPU usage went to the 55% and RAM lowered to the 350Mb. I
can agree that HP technology is useless in windows 2000 and 2000 server
but not in XP. Also I tried to run Windows 2003 server on the same machine,
and I have little bit better result then XP pro OS. Win 2003 server also
utilizing HP technology as an XP, but win 2003 server draw less memory
during encoding. Look like XP experiencing memory leakage problem on some
processes.
Thank you all for respond.
"Mike M." <nospam@someplace.com> wrote in message
news:OjP61jeWEHA.2340@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> As Zarax suggested I would try disabling Hyper Threading in the bios to
see
> if that helps. We have to do that for better high definition video
playback
> on single processor machines. I have a dual 2.4 Ghz P4 XEON machine I
> encode with but Hyper Threading didn't seem to affect it.
>
> "Eugene" <compcontrol@adelphia.net> wrote in message
> news:Oet1B5dWEHA.3740@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > Yes. I am using same set of profiles. Also I would like to add that P4
has
> a
> > CPU usage 100%, but new Xeon based machine CPU usage is 70%-80%
> > "Zarax [Digital Media MVP]"
> <ZaraxDigitalMediaMVP@discussions.microsoft.com>
> > wrote in message
> news:6B7B771C-E554-4825-A4EB-2BC94F871F09@microsoft.com...
> > > Are you using the same profiles?
> > > And also, Hypertreading might have a performance impact on WME, did
you
> > try enabling/disabling it?
> > >
> > > "Eugene" wrote:
> > >
> > > > For some time I am using Windows Media Encoder 9 to convert
> > presentations in
> > > > our company. Some presentations are about 1 hour-1 hour 20 minutes.
> The
> > > > computer, I am using pretty powerful machine. Intel P4 Hyper
treating
> > > > technology 3.06 Ghz , 512 Mb of RAM, 128Mb of Video RAM, RAID 1 ATA
> > Ultra
> > > > 133 total size of 160Gb and Sound Bluster. Performance is excellent.
> > Couple
> > > > of days ago, I've build another machine on the base of Dual Zeon
3.06
> > 512 kb
> > > > cash Hyper treating with 1 Gb of RAM, same video RAM size, same
audio
> > card,
> > > > but in this case SATA RAID 1 of total size 240 Gb. System is running
> > very
> > > > fast, but video conversion takes same amount of time to convert
> > presentation
> > > > as my P4 machine. I do not see any performance what so ever. OS on
> both
> > > > machines is Windows XP pro. Is anything I am doing wrong to achieve
> > better
> > > > performance on Dual Zeon machine? If anybody has some suggestions,
> > please
> > > > help me out.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Eugene
> > > >
> > > > compcontrol@adelphia.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
>
>
- Previous message: Scott: "Re: Streaming"
- In reply to: Mike M.: "Re: Hardware for windows media encoder"
- Next in thread: Zarax [Digital Media MVP]: "Re: Hardware for windows media encoder"
- Reply: Zarax [Digital Media MVP]: "Re: Hardware for windows media encoder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
