Re: Will Virtual PC or the new MacBookPro allow me to useI



In article <tomacguy-11C428.01145108062007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mac G
<tomacguy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <080620071645090102%helpful_harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Helpful Harry <helpful_harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Any new Mac with Intel processors will allow you to run Windows
software, but they won't run directly under Mac OS X - you need a
helper and a copy of the Windows operating system. The three main ways
are:

I'd like to add Crossover to Harry's informative list.
CrossOver Mac 6.0
Your Windows Applications, Seamlessly Integrated on Mac OS X
http://www.codeweavers.com/products/cxmac/

Crossover runs Windows Apps without Windows, however not all Win Apps
are currently supported.
http://www.codeweavers.com/compatibility/
CodeWeavers CrossOver Compatibility Center (C4)
Mission Statement
CodeWeavers' goal is to make Unix (including Linux and Mac OS X) a fully
Windows-compatible operating system. All Windows applications should be
able to be run on Unix: cleanly, harmoniously, within the native environment,
and without using an emulator. To that end, we maintain this Compatibility
Center. Here, you can learn the exact status of any given Windows
application vis-a-vis Wine. We also hope that you will join us in helping to
support your application in Wine.

That is another solution. I often don't include it since compatibility
is so low, but if the Windows application you want to run is one of the
lucky ones litsed (or works if you try it yourself), then it may be a
good solution.

There are of course other freeware / shareware options as well, but
they are usually more difficult to set up and less compatible than the
"official" solutions to running Windows on a Mac.


Helpful Harry
Hopefully helping harassed humans happily handle handiwork hardships ;o)
.



Relevant Pages

  • 15 reasons Macs are still better than Windows PCs
    ... With Windows 7 coming up, it's time to yet again ponder on whether ... I long ago stopped actively seeking out Mac vs PC discussions (partly ... Apple uses good quality parts. ... problem lies from those three apps. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: List of Applications Not Compatible with Leopard
    ... I have lots of files created on Classic versions of Mac ... lot more compatibility than you got from Apple, ... anyone who needs it has already left for Windows. ... software covers stuff *much* younger than DOS apps. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: List of Applications Not Compatible with Leopard
    ... I have lots of files created on Classic versions of Mac ... lot more compatibility than you got from Apple, ... anyone who needs it has already left for Windows. ... software covers stuff *much* younger than DOS apps. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Micro$haft desperate! Buy Windoze 7, get (virtual) XP free!
    ... That's bad news for the Mac: Vista's compatibility is quite a lot better ... The Mac is obviously not going to be compatible with his existing Windows software, and it is also not compatible with *its own* software from the prior decade. ... The way to get good compatibility is not to run another OS in a VM, but it run apps on a translation layer on top of the 'native' API. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Micro$haft desperate! Buy Windoze 7, get (virtual) XP free!
    ... That's bad news for the Mac: Vista's compatibility is quite a lot better ... Just today I got an email from someone asking to move to the Mac because they ... and OS/2's Windows VM wasn't much better. ... apps on a translation layer on top of the 'native' API. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)