Re: Despite promises, VPC 7 is impossibly slow... (TESTS Needed)
From: Jim Knotts (jknotts_at_jckassoc.com)
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: Jim Gordon MVP: "Re: Virtual PC 7 on G4 Powerbook - Too dang slow. :("
- Previous message: Kenneth Gorelick: "Re: Despite promises, VPC 7 is impossibly slow... (TESTS Needed)"
- In reply to: Kenneth Gorelick: "Re: Despite promises, VPC 7 is impossibly slow... (TESTS Needed)"
- Next in thread: jac: "Re: Despite promises, VPC 7 is impossibly slow... (TESTS Needed)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:55:57 -0500
Please realize that even though the software is made by Microsoft, it's
running on a processor that is absolutely NOT designed for Windows. What
VPC is designed to do is translate the thousands of transactions that a Mac
processor does per clock cycle into the hundred or so a PC does. No matter
what you do, VPC isn't going to run like a physical XP machine. Look at it
this way: VMWare, which is designed to run any x86 based OS on the market
on an x86 based server, works wonderfully. How many emulators that work and
work just like a real Mac, are on the market for x86 machines...??
Sorry if this dashes your dreams. I am a Microsoft Windows-based network
architect. Trust me, I would love to see this more than anyone ;)
Jim Knotts
jknotts@jckassoc.com
On 1/24/05 8:28 PM, in article BE1B0AD0.70A9%pulmon@comcast.net, "Kenneth
Gorelick" <pulmon@comcast.net> wrote:
> I was intrigued by this post so I downloaded a copy of the Performance
> Tester. It installed fine, but would not run. I installed it several times,
> and downloaded a different copy. Still would not run. I guess it is not
> compatible with VPC 7!
>
>
> On 1/22/05 4:29 PM, in article
> 1106429371.018636.201800@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com, "babcoc2@hotmail.com"
> <babcoc2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> pkazmercyk wrote:
>>> I'm (barely) running VPC 7.01 on a new PowerBook 1.5 GHZ 17" with 1GB
>>> of RAM and 512 MB dedicated to VPC, which has XP Home installed. Even
>>> with minimum graphics effects enabled and other efforts to optimize
>> its
>>> performance, Windows is just barely usable. I use it to test my web
>>> site designs online with Explorer and Netscape. ..................
>>> ........................
>>>
>>> I'm open to suggestions for performance improvements, but even a
>> search
>>> of these forums indicates I'm far from alone and Microsoft's support
>>> for this product appears nominal at best. So, before you purchase or
>>> upgrade, be sure your expectations are set very low.
>> =====================================================
>>
>> Hello: Some time ago on the Connectix forum, performance data were
>> posted.
>> It may be time for someone to post new data with G5/VPC 7...
>>
>> pkazmercyk: Perhaps the following will help you narrow down the
>> slowwness:
>>
>> Do what Kurt did... i.e., run ONLY VPC and XP (he used VPC 6 & W2K),
>> then run the comparison
>> tests using the "Performance Tester" program found at:
>>
>> http://www.passmark.com/products/pt.htm
>>
>> With a 30 day free trial you can install and compare PT on your XP
>> version against a sampling of benchmarks.
>>
>> Then, PLEASE post them here for others to share.
>>
>> Cheers, Jim b
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
-
>> Kurt L reported the following over a year ago:
>> ...........
>>
>> Subject: Performance, for the curious
>> From: e1-qcpq-kt69-cbtm@emailias.com (Kurt L)
>> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.mac.virtualpc
>> Date: Wed, Nov 12, 2003 10:33 PM
>> Message-ID: <d4506472.0311122033.39680704@posting.google.com>
>>
>> Here is the result of some testing using the Performance Test
>> application. The first number is from a real Pentium II-400 MHz
>> system, running Windows 2000. The second number is Virtual PC,
>> running on a 1 GHz G4, 1 MB of L3 cache, 133 MHz system bus, 768 MB
>> sys ram (192 MB given to Windows 2000).
>>
>> Test PII-400 VPC 6.1/Win2k
>> ----------------------- ------- ------------
>> Math - Addition 78.29 94.84
>> Math - Subtraction 77.04 95.83
>> Math - Multiplication 81.11 94.63
>> Math - Division 10.49 19.29
>> Math - Floating point addition 70.55 69.29
>> Math - Floating point subtraction 70.54 69.21
>> Math - Floating point multiplication 71.96 69.35
>> Math - Floating point division 11.92 20.69
>> Math - Maximum megaflops 96.98 102.07
>> Graphics 2D - Lines 14.70 2.81
>> Graphics - Rectangles 86.78 25.55
>> Graphics - Shapes 4.89 1.41
>> Memory - Allocate small block 200.71 379.57
>> Memory - Read cached 181.84 200.27
>> Memory - Read uncached 107.05 147.31
>> Memory - Write 133.16 157.31
>> Disk - Sequential read 24.38 19.92
>> Disk - Sequential write 17.42 3.28
>> Disk - Random seek + RW 6.73 1.36
>> MMX - Addition 122.57 139.11
>> MMX - Subtraction 122.36 143.36
>> MMX - Multiplication 119.02 93.69
>>
>> Summary statistics
>> Math Mark 58.77 65.62
>> 2D Graphics Mark 141.81 39.68
>> Memory Mark 60.72 86.23
>> Disk Mark 128.13 64.83
>> MMX Mark 61.75 63.82
>>
>> Passmark rating 72.39 51.69
>>
>> My interpretation: VPC holds its own in most places, except that it is
>> dog-slow on graphics and disk write. Think of it as a PII-400 with a
>> lousy graphics card and a slow disk. One has to be cautious about
>> generalizing from these numbers as well; likely the test code fits
>> entirely within cache on the G4, and thus tends to look better than
>> real-world. But for those looking to at least see whether Virtual PC
>> will accomplish what they have in mind, at least this is a stake in
>> the ground.
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>> (sorry about the columns, its more effort than I've got in me to make
>> them line up pretty tonight)
>>
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
-
>> ------
>>
>
> Ken Gorelick
>
- Next message: Jim Gordon MVP: "Re: Virtual PC 7 on G4 Powerbook - Too dang slow. :("
- Previous message: Kenneth Gorelick: "Re: Despite promises, VPC 7 is impossibly slow... (TESTS Needed)"
- In reply to: Kenneth Gorelick: "Re: Despite promises, VPC 7 is impossibly slow... (TESTS Needed)"
- Next in thread: jac: "Re: Despite promises, VPC 7 is impossibly slow... (TESTS Needed)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|