Re: virus patch for VPC
From: Brenda (brendaeuwer_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 12/05/04
- Next message: Nariman Riahi: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- Previous message: Brenda: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- In reply to: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- Next in thread: Nariman Riahi: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- Reply: Nariman Riahi: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- Reply: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 5 Dec 2004 10:51:47 -0800
"Fredrik Wahlgren" <fredrik.p.wahlgren@mailbox.swipnet.se> wrote in message news:<eJ5GrVg2EHA.1400@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>...
> "Bob Harris" <plasticnitlion@wrappermindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:BDD716B6.44EBA%plasticnitlion@wrappermindspring.com...
> > Bill Leeper wrote:
> > > Bob Harris wrote:
> > >> Brenda wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>> I installed a virus protector in my VPC. I installed the AVG 6.0
> > >>>> (free edition)
> > >>>> I keep getting this MS security patch (in my e-mail)
> > >>>> and they recommend to install this patch for security. Does this
> > >>>> patch work with the AVG 6.0
> > >>>> or is it seperate? Should I install this patch?
> > >>
> > >> and Fredrik Wahlgren replied:
> > >>
> > >>> Don't EVER run any kind of "security patch" that comes with email. If
> you
> > >>> run the attachment, you will get a a virus or some other kind malware
> on
> > >>> your computer. The only way to get real patches from MS is to point
> your
> > >>> browser at: http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/en/default.asp
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> While I believe what you are saying, Fredrik, is there really any
> reason for
> > >> Brenda to trust what you're telling her more than what that zombie-sent
> > >> e-mail is telling her? How does she know that URL is valid?
> > >>
> > >> Bob H
> > >
> > > If one is going to err in this matter then they should err on the side
> > > of caution. Which would mean giving more credence to someone advocating
> > > not to install the patch. And he is right, MS does not email patches to
> > > people.
> >
> > Is it really that clear which side is the cautious one? Arnold says "You
> > need to install this lock, otherwise someone can break into your house".
> > Beth says "Don't install his lock, he has a pass key". To "err on the
> side
> > of caution", who do you trust?
> >
> > Understand, I'm not advocating that Brenda should install the e-mailed
> > patch. I'm convinced it's a spoof. The point is that Brenda has to be
> > smart enough to understand whether she should trust that e-mail or trust
> > advice from Fredrik.
> >
> > Fredrik also wrote:
> > > There is [a way to verify the URL is valid]. After you click on the
> link, make
> > > sure the text in the browser is the same as on the link.
> >
> > Suppose the URL were to
> > http://V4.WINDOWSUPDATE.MICR0SOFT.COM/EN/DEFAULT.ASP
> > Does that look like a valid URL? Depending on the font your browser uses
> to
> > dipslay the URL, you may or may not notice the first oh in MICR0SOFT is
> > really a zero. And that's a different place on the web than the genuine
> > microsoft, right?
> >
> > Bob H
> >
>
> -Bob,
> you're right. I admit that a link may look valid and that when you click on
> it, the browser will point at that link and yet you end up somewhere else
> than on microsoft's site. I have to admit that submiiting a link to a ng
> could be used as a way to trick people to download some malware to a few
> computers. I have clicked on some of the URL's that were sent in order to
> make people enter their credit card numbers or similar. In most - if not
> all - of these cases, I could clearly see that I had come to sites which
> clearly different from waht the sender wanted the recipients to believe.
>
> / Fredrik
Hi Again,
Ok, this is what I get often-
From: "MS Corporation Network Security
Section",bszvsucip@confidence.ms.com>
It says attachment (s) deleted due to virus:
1. installer63.exe: W32 SwenA@mm
Then I get another e-mail marked as junk that says
file attachment: hvzqebv.exe
The file attached to this e-mail was removed because it is infected
with the W32 Swen.A@mm virus.
Are these fakes?
They do not send e-mails to people to tell them viruses have been
removed? right?
Thank you
Brenda
- Next message: Nariman Riahi: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- Previous message: Brenda: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- In reply to: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- Next in thread: Nariman Riahi: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- Reply: Nariman Riahi: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- Reply: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: virus patch for VPC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|