Re: Bullet weirdness
- From: Posterizer <askme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:16:06 -0700
In article <C4942E44.16BCF%john@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
John McGhie <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What did you think of Shauna's site?
Thanks, John.
Shauna's site looked very useful (I found myself nosing around other
parts after looking into the bullets). The sections on bullets looked
clearly written, and not too complicated, but they were lengthy so I
didn't read them in detail yet. I'm reluctant to mess with styles as
I've never had much luck in my dabbling with them, but it seems I may
have to give in and learn a bit more.
I'm still stumped as to why my simple document is displaying different
only the two computers. I opened the doc on both computers, and
checked the font settings under Format>Style>Modify and both listed
Cambria. I think opened Font Book and both computers have Cambria
installed on them.
Yet only the computer that I originally created the document on will
display the bullets correctly.
_dennis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bullet weirdness
- From: John McGhie
- Re: Bullet weirdness
- From: CyberTaz
- Re: Bullet weirdness
- References:
- Bullet weirdness
- From: Posterizer
- Re: Bullet weirdness
- From: John McGhie
- Re: Bullet weirdness
- From: Posterizer
- Re: Bullet weirdness
- From: John McGhie
- Bullet weirdness
- Prev by Date: Re: Custom dictionary is not available
- Next by Date: Re: AutoCorrect seemingly not working with new commands
- Previous by thread: Re: Bullet weirdness
- Next by thread: Re: Bullet weirdness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|