Re: increase in file size ii

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



No. That's why I didn't answer the first time :-)

Yes, we know "what" is causing it. But "No", you can't do anything about
it.

There's a cross-platform work-around to deal with the graphics
incompatibilities between the two platforms. Whenever the graphic hits the
"other" platform, Word converts it into the native format for that platform.
To avoid having to do this every time, it stores the conversion in the
document for fast display.

If you add a PICT to a Mac document, or PNG to a PC document, it will be
converted on the other platform. When it is converted, you end up with four
copies of the image in the document: the original and the low-resolution
"display" version on the Mac, and a High-res and low-res conversion on the
PC.

You might find that if you use PNG as the format for the graphics, it won't
be converted on either platform, so you won't get the bloat. Worth a try?

Cheers


On 30/1/06 10:45 AM, in article
85DD95A7-8CAD-4F58-8E87-EAA84B794AA1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "leejav"
<leejav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> anyone have any ideas?
>
> "leejav" wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys.
>>
>> I've been searching through these forums for an answer to our problem. As
>> yet i've only found one topic which seems to be on the same lines, but the
>> solution doesn't help. Let me explain.
>>
>> We've created some word templates on a mac. These templates include graphics
>> which we can't removed as they're part of the design. The graphics have been
>> inserted in to word as jpg images with medium compression (nothing more than
>> 100K). The template (.dot) file is only 114K on the mac.
>>
>> Now when these templates are sent to the client who works in word on a pc
>> and she opens and then saves the files (either as another .dot or a .doc) the
>> file sizes inflate to over 3mb in size without adding any additional graphics
>> or text.
>>
>> I've been running a few tests with this over the morning and it seems that
>> if i create a .dot on a pc, with no content at all, and copy it to the mac.
>> Then place the same image in on the mac and send the file back to the PC, the
>> file DOESN'T inflate when it's then saved on the PC. It only seems to be with
>> word docs or tamplates that have been created on a mac which cause this
>> problem.
>>
>> Does anyone have any ideas why this is happening? Also do you know how we
>> can 'fix' about 30 multi page word templates we've already created in word on
>> the mac so when they're sent to a pc they don't inflate in size?
>>
>> Any help or advise would be appreciated.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Leigh

--

Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.

John McGhie <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Microsoft MVP, Word and Word for Macintosh. Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 (0) 4 1209 1410

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: increase in file size ii
    ... a blank word document created on a pc then copied to a mac wouldn't have the ... The graphics we were using were simple jpg images, ... "other" platform, Word converts it into the native format for that platform. ... We've created some word templates on a mac. ...
    (microsoft.public.mac.office.word)
  • Re: So frustrating... (cross-platform development)
    ... The #1 showstopper IME was the lack of LCL bitmap ScanLine equivalent, ... ie. an hardware and platform independent graphics foundation. ... The current policy of deferring everything to native component sets, ... I can see the point of using native components for each platform, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: the size of a (blank) document based on a template increases very much...
    ... The solution to that problem is "Don't include large graphics in a template" ... Each platform as a native graphics format. ... You can slow this down by using PNG as the graphics format: ...
    (microsoft.public.mac.office.word)
  • Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
    ... I'm willing to bet that there are few other languages that could pull it off in as few lines of code. ... Even with something like Python, since graphics aren't native, you end up using one of the windowing toolkits such as wxGTK or wxPython, and "just making a stupid plot" tends to consume a lot more code than one might expect. ... Why would I want to port it to another platform? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: DRAW 1280, 1024
    ... Ruby is awesomely more powerful than BBC ... but why no trivial graphics support? ... dozens of Ruby modules that have varying implementation by platform ... but sockets don't compare well with a graphic interface. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)