Re: office assistant
- From: JE McGimpsey <jemcgimpsey@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 12:34:47 -0600
In article <1gwylv4.45cllf11250fqN%matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
matt@xxxxxxxxxxx (matt neuburg) wrote:
> I'm just saying that there are a lot of problems that are serious and
> important and very real, and it's truly not worth wasting any
> bandwidth on this newsgroup or in your brain worrying about why the
> stupid Office Assistant doesn't look like Albert Einstein or a paper
> clip.
Much less wasting bandwidth complaining about it...
Your not trimming the previous post wasted more than the original, after
all.
Heck, your signature advertising *alone* wastes nearly as much
bandwidth as the original post!
I'd have thought that the subject line would allow most people who don't
care about the office assistant to avoid expending bandwidth on anything
but the header. I only looked because you replied, and I was surprised.
And as far as what the OP wastes one's "brain bandwidth" on, I'd think
that's really up to the OP.
.
- References:
- office assistant
- From: wen46
- Re: office assistant
- From: matt neuburg
- Re: office assistant
- From: Daiya Mitchell
- Re: office assistant
- From: matt neuburg
- office assistant
- Prev by Date: Re: office assistant
- Next by Date: Re: office assistant
- Previous by thread: Re: office assistant
- Next by thread: Re: office assistant
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|