Re: Incredible Expanding Database!
From: Paul Berkowitz (berkowit_at_spoof_silcom.com)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: Robin Sofer: "Entourage and Mororola V620"
- Previous message: Bill Weylock: "Re: Incredible Expanding Database!"
- In reply to: Bill Weylock: "Re: Incredible Expanding Database!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:46:19 -0800
On 12/24/04 2:08 PM, in article BDF1D349.206DD%bill@nospam.net, "Bill
Weylock" <bill@nospam.net> wrote:
> Well, we certainly have this handled.
>
Good.
>
> The only thing I still think needs stressing is that if they are going to give
> us a truly ³modern² program with all these complexities, they should give us a
> way to manage the database. Even your script, as good as it doubtless is, does
> not do everything I would want: send everything to an archive that will sit
> there until needed, and when accessed will give us everything we had before:
> all links, contacts, attachments, everything.
>
Right. The .rge archives are v1.0. They need to be improved to recreate all
flags and - if possible - in links. (Don't forget that if you archived some
types of items to a different archive and then deleted originals, they will
no longer be available to be linked to. The best you could hope for would be
links to other items in the same archive and any pre-existing originals
still intact.)
>
> Additionally, they should give us a way to detach attachments to a separate
> folder for a range of messages.
>
But they DO have a way! I explained that already several times. Make an
appropriate rue or rules for just the "range of messages" you want, and set
the rule to Save Attachments and Delete Attachments. Some day they could add
the Link function my script will do, but since a script can do it there's no
loss. I guess it would be good if they added a feature to Reveal Link (in
the case of Files) in addition to Open Link.
>
> I have tons of disk space left. The only issue is that the Retrospect archives
> increase by leaps and bounds because of the ever-changing large database file.
> Now that I know there is no good cure, though, Iıll just live with that. I
> definitely am going to continue backing up every day, and Entourage isnıt
> going to change, so there we are.
>
The technique I use with Retrospect is to add another Retrospect every 2
weeks that backs up the regular backup file to a reserve file and then does
a Recycle backup instead of a Normal backup to the regular backup file. It's
all automatic. That means I always have at least 2 weeks and up to 4 weeks
of daily backups at any time, and sets the regular backup file back to a
manageable size every two weeks. It works well.
>
> I agree that itıs worth sticking with Entourage and will do that. I just think
> they need to do better by us.
-- Paul Berkowitz MVP MacOffice Entourage FAQ Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/faq/index.html> AppleScripts for Entourage: <http://macscripter.net/scriptbuilders/> Please "Reply To Newsgroup" to reply to this message. Emails will be ignored. PLEASE always state which version of Microsoft Office you are using - **2004**, X or 2001. It's often impossible to answer your questions otherwise.
- Next message: Robin Sofer: "Entourage and Mororola V620"
- Previous message: Bill Weylock: "Re: Incredible Expanding Database!"
- In reply to: Bill Weylock: "Re: Incredible Expanding Database!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
