IMAP vs POP affecting database size
From: Steven Day (news_at_stevenday.us)
Date: 06/22/04
- Next message: Colin Hunter: "Entourage 2004 + Exchange: cannot send email or see delegate server"
- Previous message: Corentin Cras-Méneur QMVP=5D?=: "Re: Scheduling problems in Entourage 2004 and MS Exchange 2003"
- Next in thread: Dave Cortright: "Re: IMAP vs POP affecting database size"
- Reply: Dave Cortright: "Re: IMAP vs POP affecting database size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:07:21 -0600
Will storing messages on an IMAP server help to keep the size of the
database down much? Or is any difference negligible? I have some rather
large POP boxes and am thinking of moving them over to an IMAP server (with
future messages to be sent to the IMAP account as well).
TIA.
PS How does one set up an email address for news postings in Entourage that
cannot be harvested?
- Next message: Colin Hunter: "Entourage 2004 + Exchange: cannot send email or see delegate server"
- Previous message: Corentin Cras-Méneur QMVP=5D?=: "Re: Scheduling problems in Entourage 2004 and MS Exchange 2003"
- Next in thread: Dave Cortright: "Re: IMAP vs POP affecting database size"
- Reply: Dave Cortright: "Re: IMAP vs POP affecting database size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
