Re: Now that SHA-1 is cracked...
From: Paul Adare (padare_at_newsguy.com)
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: Roland Hall: "Re: Referring pages?"
- Previous message: vichet: "Strang Problem"
- In reply to: Galen: "Re: Now that SHA-1 is cracked..."
- Next in thread: Galen: "Re: Now that SHA-1 is cracked..."
- Reply: Galen: "Re: Now that SHA-1 is cracked..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:03:30 -0500
In article <O1nK6JIGFHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, in the
microsoft.public.windows.server.security news group, Galen
<galennews@gmail.com> says...
> How snide... At what point did I say that I knew anything about
> cryptography??? I think, if you look at my post, all I did was point to
> where the OP had gotten the information. I made no comment of the veracity
> of the post, the news, nor of Matt's statement. In fact, having read a great
> deal of Matt's posts in the past I tend to trust what he says. My post was
> only referring to the origin of the OP's post.
>
My apologies. I meant to follow up to the OP and not to your post. Had
the wrong one selected when I posted.
-- Paul Adare "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
- Next message: Roland Hall: "Re: Referring pages?"
- Previous message: vichet: "Strang Problem"
- In reply to: Galen: "Re: Now that SHA-1 is cracked..."
- Next in thread: Galen: "Re: Now that SHA-1 is cracked..."
- Reply: Galen: "Re: Now that SHA-1 is cracked..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
