Re: Secure sites... and the theory of relativity
From: John Cesta (lists_at_lookwww.com)
Date: 01/28/05
- Next message: Jportelas: "Re: Issue: IIS6(in Isolation Mode) and SSL"
- Previous message: Egbert Nierop \(MVP for IIS\): "Re: "Response.Buffer=false" broken in IIS6?"
- In reply to: Ron Weldy: "Secure sites... and the theory of relativity"
- Next in thread: Kristofer Gafvert: "Re: Secure sites... and the theory of relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:37:08 GMT
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:08:13 -0800, "Ron Weldy" <ronweldy@msn.com>
wrote:
>In the past, I have always handled secure sections of websites using IIS.
>You put the files you want to transfer data securely in a folder and you
>indicate that in IIS. If you really need to force the url, then I have also
>encountered code that picks up the current domain or server and then
>concatenates the url accordingly.
I think it's just preference. Not everyone does it the same way and
your or his way isn't necessarily the "correct" way it's just the way
it works for you or others.
John Cesta
The CPU Checker - Monitors your CPU % while you sleep
LogFileManager - IIS LogFile Management Tool
WebPageChecker - Helps Maintain Server UpTime
DomainReportIt PRO - Helps Rebuild IIS
http://www.serverautomationtools.com
>
>Now, I have this site that someone else set up and they have hard-coded the
>links with the https prefix to force them to be handled securely (not to
>mention some other plain ol' links as well). Why would they not setup secure
>directories? I can't remember if IIS prevents you from running the pages in
>a non-secure mode. Of course, the other major problem with this in that it's
>a pain in the *** if you're using a test server. Anyone know why someone
>would do this? Is there some search engine penalty if you don't hard code
>full urls in html? Another interesting thing is that this is buried in
>asp.net controls, which I don't even expose links, so I really don't
>understand why that is not done using relative links, unless there is some
>goofy-ness with these controls living in the bin folder. At any rate, I
>usually use relative pathing myself just to keep my sanity when testing.
>
>All opinions are welcome, before I set about trying to correct this mess!
>
- Next message: Jportelas: "Re: Issue: IIS6(in Isolation Mode) and SSL"
- Previous message: Egbert Nierop \(MVP for IIS\): "Re: "Response.Buffer=false" broken in IIS6?"
- In reply to: Ron Weldy: "Secure sites... and the theory of relativity"
- Next in thread: Kristofer Gafvert: "Re: Secure sites... and the theory of relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|