Re: IIS 6 is a steaming pile of shit

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

From: MIMF (mimf_at_onvol.net)
Date: 01/22/05

  • Next message: roberto3214_at_netscape.net: "Re: W2K3 IIS 6.0 ASP.NET Requests Per Second Limits?" 
    Date: 22 Jan 2005 13:06:56 -0800

    Apart from being ignorant, you're a liar too. Look what YOU SAID:

    --- XML can work wonders as a small database

    and then

    --- Conversion, depending on the size of the database to XML
    --- files is actually simple and could be a viable solution.

    _CONVERTING_ a DATABASE to XML files... and _actually_ SIMPLE! And
    _VIABLE_! If it wasn't funny, it would be sad. Anyone who has EVER
    worked with an SQL database and XML will tell you that, although there
    are simple ways of exchanging data between the two, they are EVERYTHING
    but replacements for each other. Not to mention that I said that the
    applications I was talking about consist of 2 MB of ASP code that works
    with Access database, and now this retard suggests someone 'converts'
    all this code to work with a bunch of XML files. NEVER MIND that 90% of
    tables have tens of thousands of records. NEVER MIND that you can't do
    SQL JOINs between tables and XML files. NEVER MIND that it would take 2
    years to convert all that code, so that it would work 100 times worse
    than it did in the first place. NEVER MIND that XML files are text
    files so it's very difficult to make sure concurrent updates to them
    are safe, not to mention horribly slow performance. NEVER MIND that
    everything worked like a dream on Windows 2000 with an average of 50
    concurrent users. Why do you talk about things you have NO CLUE about,
    retard? I bet you never wrote a line of either SQL or XML in your
    miserable life. So shut up finally and stop embarassing yourself.

  • Next message: roberto3214_at_netscape.net: "Re: W2K3 IIS 6.0 ASP.NET Requests Per Second Limits?"
    • Quantcast