Re: User authentication vs. Firewall
From: Jeff Cochran (jcochran.nospam_at_naplesgov.com)
Date: 03/30/04
- Previous message: Mythran: "401.1 Error"
- In reply to: Jorge: "User authentication vs. Firewall"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: User authentication vs. Firewall"
- Reply: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: User authentication vs. Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:58:23 GMT
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:01:03 -0800, "Jorge"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>Hello,
>I have an intranet server (IIS4 - NT4) that requires
>username/password to connect and also has SSL configured.
>
>When I access through the local area network with the
>local IP in my browser it works fine (it asks me for
>https, and user/pass).
>
>I have only one static IP and I want to NAT some ports to
>my server so I can access the intranet server from
>internet. The point is that even when I configured ports
>443 and 80 to be routed to my server I can't contact the
>server (using either the domain name or the public IP
>address).
>
>However, if I change the router config of port 80 to
>another intranet test server that doesn't require either
>SSL or user/pass I can access the test server from
>internet using either domain name or public IP.
>
>I believe that my mistake is that I should configure
>something else on my router in orther to route some other
>port (I don't know which one) to the intranet secure
>server. Am I right?
>Does anyone know what should I enable on my router?
The router support folks probably do. :)
Jeff
- Previous message: Mythran: "401.1 Error"
- In reply to: Jorge: "User authentication vs. Firewall"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: User authentication vs. Firewall"
- Reply: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: User authentication vs. Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
