Re: Order of Logged Options
From: David Wang [Msft] (someone_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/12/04
- Next message: Just me: "Using "../" in Includes."
- Previous message: David Wang [Msft]: "Re: IIS 6.0 ASP pages run very slow"
- In reply to: Heath Stewart: "Re: Order of Logged Options"
- Next in thread: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Order of Logged Options"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:57:04 -0800
We did not decide to switch it for no good reason. We had technical reasons
for switching the order -- you realize that the entire IIS networking stack
was rewritten in IIS6, so there are tons of behavior change. In cases that
made sense, we preserved (or tried to) the existing behavior. In other
cases where it didn't make sense or was technically challenging for little
benefit, we kept the difference. In cases where the change is erroneous,
there are KB articles and ongoing bugs. In cases where the change is within
reason, we still publish some KB articles.
This would be an instance of the latter case.
-- //David IIS This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. // "Heath Stewart" <nospam.clubstew@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%2374Qy8K8DHA.2480@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... I understand that and wasn't trying to imply that IIS isn't within specifications (I figured any good spec isn't going to be so fixed in nature), just that IIS has been using the same order for a while and all of a sudden switched. I agree that AWStats should include a better parser, but I know they're not the only one. I'll take a look at LogParser from the reskit. Thank you. -- Heath Stewart, Microsoft MVP Director of Technology Proplanner http://www.proplanner.com
- Next message: Just me: "Using "../" in Includes."
- Previous message: David Wang [Msft]: "Re: IIS 6.0 ASP pages run very slow"
- In reply to: Heath Stewart: "Re: Order of Logged Options"
- Next in thread: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Order of Logged Options"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
