Re: More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- From: "Sanford Whiteman" <swhitemanlistens-software@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:31:19 -0400
A user comes into my SMTP server, using a userid and password. The
userid/password is no longer valid (it was at one time, but not
anymore).
The spammers still come to the SMTP server, and (attempt) to send
emails. The SMTP server accepts the emails, then bit-buckets them.
That's incorrect. If your session is not authenticated via (valid)
SMTP AUTH credentials or because your session is coming from a
pre-authenticated source IP, IIS will only accept messages for domains
_for which it does not require authentication_. You cannot submit mail
for domains that require authentication before relaying.
That is what "requiring authentication" means, and it occurs during
the original SMTP submission attempt. There is no post-acceptance,
pre-delivery bit-bucketing; IIS SMTP has no such feature. If a message
does get accepted for delivery, it's not a fakeout: it means
authentication was not required for delivery to the recipient domain,
and delivery will indeed be attempted to the recipient domain. If the
recipient turns out to be unreachable, _and the sender is also
unreachable_ for a bounce notification, then mail will be placed in
\Badmail. That is not the same as simply bit-bucketing the original
message. It's the result of a double-bounce.
Don't know what could be leading you to believe that the
authenticated/unauthenticated state is interpreted after submission,
as opposed to during the attempt to submit. True, that state can be
made available to other (3rd-party) anti-spam programs that may
process mail after acceptance and take corresponding action (such as
whitelisting authenticated submissions), but that's not what we're
talking about.
--Sandy
------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
------------------------------------
.
- References:
- More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- From: PeterD
- Re: More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- From: Sanford Whiteman
- Re: More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- From: PeterD
- Re: More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- From: Sanford Whiteman
- Re: More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- From: PeterD
- Re: More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- From: Sanford Whiteman
- Re: More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- From: PeterD
- More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- Prev by Date: Re: More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- Next by Date: Re: duplicate emails
- Previous by thread: Re: More questins on SMTP spam attacks.
- Next by thread: Re: duplicate emails
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading