Re: BCC in message to pickup folder is NOT "blind"



Microsoft acknowledged this as a bug in other SMTP server versions such
as that provided with IIS on Windows 2000 and Exchange Srvr. 4.0. Those
products were patched to address this VERY SAME issue.

I think you're mixing different issues. Do not worry about a patch.
(Exchange 4.0?!?)

Again, you are the mail client. You do not technically submit over
SMTP, but the special x- headers are interpreted as RFC 821 envelope
variables, not RFC 822 header variables:

x-sender = RFC 821 MAIL FROM:
x-receiver = RFC 821 RCPT TO:

Before ever posting my question here I read both RFC 821 and 822
[http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc821.html
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html]

Neither of these documents seems to address "x-sender" or "x-receiver" --
what you term "pickup headers."

As I said, these are special non-standard headers (note the x-) that
are supported only in the IIS SMTP Pickup feature. While they appear
to be part of the RFC 822 content, they are actually just placeholders
for data normally supplied via TCP port 25. When you craft a message
to place in \Pickup, you can add special headers which _simulate_ RFC
821 envelope data, even though envelope data is usually only seen at
the SMTP protocol level. By using these headers, you can create
messages that have different envelope (true) and header (apparent)
recipients. That's exactly what tou get from BCC:.

More to the point, is there a BCC pickup header?

x-receiver.


I can get "x-sender" and "x-receiver" to work within a txt message dropped
in the pickup folder, but I still can NOT figure out the syntax for BCC.

You mention "RFC 821 envelope variables" . . . RFC does not even mention
BCC. Is THAT where my problem stems from?!

Bcc: users are users that DO appear in the SMTP envelope -- and thus
do receive copies of the message -- but DO NOT appear in the message
headers in transit.

FWIW, "!=" may be unclear to those NOT schooled in C++, C# or JScript.
To avoid unambiguity for the legions of VB.Net coders out there you may
wish to ALSO write <> or simply "not equal."

Look, but if a "coder" doesn't know what != means, I'm not giving
them a leg up. :)

NON-coders... that's a different point, and perhaps I could be less
symbolic.

--Sandy



------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
------------------------------------
.



Relevant Pages

  • RE: No IP address logging on internal email.
    ... The headers you describe are SMTP ... the same server MAPI doesn't add anything to the SMTP header. ... "Send-As" permission is sending-as these users, so check mailbox rights. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.transport)
  • Re: Strange SPAM with no tracks...!?
    ... the destination domain generates a NDR for the recipient in your domain whose email address was spoofed in headers. ... If the destination domain did a SenderID check and you had SPF records published, it would have been easy to determine that the sending host is not authorized to send for your domain and this sort of thing can be avoided. ... For assistance, contact your system administrator. ... Searching for co.sutter.ca.us in the Exchange SMTP logs gives me no hits at all. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: sed usage question
    ... Standardizing Network Mail Headers from September 1973 ... I know it is in the Mail and Http RFC having had to debug some agents. ... carriage or printer to start of line and feeds the paper to the next ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Server.sendmail with no "to_addrs" parameter.
    ... solely in the CC and/or BCC fields - both of which are possible through ... headers - rfc2822 has the minimum number listed as 0 ... can't get mail delivered via SMTP without a RCPT TO command at SMTP ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: What is with the From field containing UTF-8 stuff?
    ... That does not permit Google to use UTF-8 in headers; ... actual rules are the more restrictive of those in RFC 3977 and RFC1036++. ... MUST NOT This phrase, or the phrase "SHALL NOT", mean that the ...
    (news.software.readers)