Re: IIS 5's SMTP and Stopping NDR's ?
- From: "Sanford Whiteman" <swhitemanlistens-software@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 02:22:36 -0400
What's happening is that a lot of people
send SPAM to my server (to non-existent addresses)...
There is little reason for a contemporary MX to accept mail for non-existent addresses. Your problem starts there. What is it that prevents you from loading a recipient list and using a transport event sink to reject at the connection level?
The issue of suppressing NDRs -- accepting, then later bit-bucketing, messages firmly identified as spam -- is different. That's the "Bouncing spam is bad netizenship/bouncing spam makes you complicit in Joe Jobs" vs. "Not bouncing undelivered messages breaks the RFCs/you can never be sure enough of spamminess" debate. *That* debate has swung strongly in favor of the first position for several years.
--Sandy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IIS 5's SMTP and Stopping NDR's ?
- From: Dave Onex
- Re: IIS 5's SMTP and Stopping NDR's ?
- References:
- IIS 5's SMTP and Stopping NDR's ?
- From: Dave Onex
- IIS 5's SMTP and Stopping NDR's ?
- Prev by Date: Re: 1
- Next by Date: Re: IIS 5's SMTP and Stopping NDR's ?
- Previous by thread: IIS 5's SMTP and Stopping NDR's ?
- Next by thread: Re: IIS 5's SMTP and Stopping NDR's ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|