Re: windows clustering or NLB

On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:18:01 -0800, jimi hendrix
<jimihendrix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Witch is the beter option for me,

I have one windows 2003 standard edition ftp server in my perimiter sinds
more clients keep connecting (now 300, planning for 700) and the ftp site has
to be available allways I was thinking about

set up a windows 2003 server cluster , or let NLB take care of the load on
the ftp hosts and do I have to set up a shared storage (san ) for NLB...

what is the best option for redundance ( microsoft way )

all the comments are very welcome..

None of this has anything to do with FTP. Read up on NLB and
understand the fail-over capabilities, clustering would normally be
the smarter, but more expensive choice.

Jeff
.

Loading