Re: static files and asp
From: Curt_C [MVP] (software_AT_darkfalz.com)
Date: 03/03/05
- Previous message: Jack: "Error in asp text: Command text not set for the command"
- In reply to: Mike D: "RE: static files and asp"
- Next in thread: Steven Burn: "Re: static files and asp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:48:33 -0600
storing them outside the path but then adding a VD pretty much negates any
security gain. I mean if you already have the NTFS permissions set properly
and the site configured its the same, as far as what it would take to get to
the file, whether its a direct sub folder or one outside the www path
-- Curt Christianson Site & Scripts: http://www.Darkfalz.com Blog: http://blog.Darkfalz.com "Mike D" <MikeD@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:221647A9-2892-43B1-A7B6-5B5011A8B2BB@microsoft.com... >I guess I should have said these files are being accessed through fso, and >I > will need the ability in asp to upload and create folders. That's all > fine I > just wonder about what is the safest. Clients can't know who our other > clients are. > > Mike > > "Mike D" wrote: > >> I have a site that will be displaying static files to clients. Each >> client >> will have their owb directory locked down through NTFS permissions. >> Currently I have a Client folder in the wwwroot then that client folder >> has a >> folder for static files in it. How much more secure would it be if I >> moved >> it out of the wwwroot and used a virtual directory? >> >> Thanks >> Mike
- Previous message: Jack: "Error in asp text: Command text not set for the command"
- In reply to: Mike D: "RE: static files and asp"
- Next in thread: Steven Burn: "Re: static files and asp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
